Transfer Case Swap Info NP249->NP231 & NP242 - Page 133 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Grand Cherokee & Commander Forums > ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum > Transfer Case Swap Info NP249->NP231 & NP242

SALE PRICING, Specials, Huge Savings Alloy USA and Posi-LoFord Explorer 8.8 4340 Chromoly Axle Shaft Kit C Clip ElimStainless Steel Door Hinge Pins

Reply
Unread 01-29-2014, 04:13 PM   #1981
Myusername1674
Web Wheeler
 
Myusername1674's Avatar
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurdaJs View Post
The 46rh you '95ers have is physically longer than the 44re and 42re, plus the dana35 vs 44a arent exactly the same so its hard to apply what us 96-98ers have done to your setup. So id measure your current shaft and maybe youll get lucky and find a suitable donor a the jy for the length you need. A jy driveshaft shouldnt be more than 25 bucks, but its hard to find one that isnt fubar from the forklifts. Shortening your current ds should be about $100 at a driveline shop

Something to remember is the fact that the t cases are pretty much the same size, the differences in overall t case length is determined by the rear output. Internal slip yoke is about 1.5" shorter than external slip yoke.
If you do shorten it, make sure you check local shops first, you can find a better price thiw way. Mine was only $50 to shorten and balance, they did good clean work too

__________________
95 FiveTwo ZJ, DD, Lifted, Locked on 35s, Build (in progress)

My 5.9 swap (in progress)

Want your zj to be doorless in 60 seconds?
Myusername1674 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 01-29-2014, 04:24 PM   #1982
ZJNewbi3
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 778
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurdaJs View Post
Something to remember is the fact that the t cases are pretty much the same size, the differences in overall t case length is determined by the rear output. Internal slip yoke is about 1.5" shorter than external slip yoke.
So, if I have an external slip yoke, and get a 242 with the same (if possible) I wouldn't really have to shorten anything? But the write up does say that an internal is better cause its bathed in ATF+4.

I'll prob write down the measurements of my drive shafts and take em to the yard and check if they match with the donor. Does Haynes manual explain how to properly measure the shafts?
__________________
Just trying to keep her goin'!!
ZJNewbi3 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-05-2014, 12:35 PM   #1983
bjorn17
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tallinn, Harjumaa
Posts: 64
Need a bit of clarification. In the first post it was mentioned that you can use a new gear cut 242 and mate it with an old gear cut 249, but can you do vica versa?

I am thinking of getting a 242 from an XJ 1993 and putting it under my ZJ 1996 with 249. Can I make the swap (using both cases for parts ofcourse, no direct fit, different length shafts)
bjorn17 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-05-2014, 12:38 PM   #1984
SWVATrails
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Abingdon, Virginia
Posts: 34
I've found a donor 242 to swap for my 249 in a 1995 Zj 4.0, would this be a exact swap or is the shaft and spline count different since it's a different tcase? I would assume it's the same considering it came out of a 95 Zj which is the same as mine
SWVATrails is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-06-2014, 09:53 AM   #1985
Myusername1674
Web Wheeler
 
Myusername1674's Avatar
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjorn17 View Post
Need a bit of clarification. In the first post it was mentioned that you can use a new gear cut 242 and mate it with an old gear cut 249, but can you do vica versa?

I am thinking of getting a 242 from an XJ 1993 and putting it under my ZJ 1996 with 249. Can I make the swap (using both cases for parts ofcourse, no direct fit, different length shafts)
I think you can do the case half swap, where you use the back of the 249 that you currently have, and swap the rest from your new to you 242. That may be right, but I've never done this so you'll want to look into this more before doing it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SWVATrails View Post
I've found a donor 242 to swap for my 249 in a 1995 Zj 4.0, would this be a exact swap or is the shaft and spline count different since it's a different tcase? I would assume it's the same considering it came out of a 95 Zj which is the same as mine
It should be the same, though it is hard to say without pulling both cases and comparing the size of the input shafts. If they're different sizes you could swap inputs (a pretty easy job with basic mechanic skills), but this also depends when the two jeeps were actually manufactured. MY 95 was manufactured oct. 1994, so it got the later gear cut. If either one was from the earlier part of the 1994 year it could very well have the early gear cut. Spline count and all should be the same though. I think, I'm no expert so maybe an expert on this will help you out better.
__________________
95 FiveTwo ZJ, DD, Lifted, Locked on 35s, Build (in progress)

My 5.9 swap (in progress)

Want your zj to be doorless in 60 seconds?
Myusername1674 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-09-2014, 08:08 PM   #1986
redfox103
Registered User
1997 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 5
97 zj

is there a tcase that will need no swapping of shafts done for a 97 zj?
redfox103 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-09-2014, 08:20 PM   #1987
ejschultz
Web Wheeler
 
ejschultz's Avatar
1997 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Crown Point, Indiana
Posts: 3,153
Quote:
Originally Posted by redfox103 View Post
is there a tcase that will need no swapping of shafts done for a 97 zj?
It's a crap shoot. Regardless of donor vehicle and your vehicle, you may or may not need to shorten the shaft. Some people on here get away without modifying it at all. Others, myself included, needed to shorten their stock shaft. I guess my shaft was just too long.
__________________
97 ZJ - 5.2L, 242, 4" IRO lift w/short arms & adj. TBs, JKS Discos/BPEs, DT3000s, Aussie'd 44A, sliders, OEM skids/hooks/hitch, 31" Duratracs on 15x8s
14 JKU Sport S - Stock
Build
ejschultz is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-10-2014, 01:59 AM   #1988
MurdaJs
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Woods
Posts: 1,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by redfox103 View Post
is there a tcase that will need no swapping of shafts done for a 97 zj?
Input shafts from any zj or xj 96+ 242 or 231 should be the same.

Driveshafts are another story. 249,242, and 231 are all really close. The rear output slipyoke is where the difference is. Exposed slip yoke is about 1.5 inches longer overall than a tcase with an internal slip yoke.

A 242 or 231 from a 96+ zj or xj is probably external slip yoke, so in theory your driveshaft MAY be too long. Some people say they didnt need to shorten it, some have had to.
__________________
Built one piece at a time, and it cost me many dimes
MurdaJs is online now   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-12-2014, 12:55 PM   #1989
v8chero
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Posts: 1
Hi guys,

I recently bought Grand Cherokee ZJ, 5.2 V8, 1996, with 242 transfer case installed. When I checked the oil level in the transfer case it was almost dry. Next I filled needed oil level and after short drive most of oil went out.
Starting to look the reason, I discovered that the rear shaft seal is not connected with the shaft tight.

Red circle shows that thicker part after the bearing is too deep and seal can not reach it. Seal stays in thinner area of the shaft, and oil goes out.


More pictures from my 242



Here I found 242 picture from internet


Here I see that shaft thick part (marked red) is much longer and going out from enclosure.

I think there are different parts collected together and shaft is from other transfer case, or some self made mixture is done.
Transfer case itself working and all positions as well, under the load strange noise comeing from somewere, but I`m not sure from where.

I try to find solution how to keep oil inside, because original seal is not working.

Maybe you guys here can tell what has been done with my transfer case and what could be the best solution to fix it.

Thanks!
v8chero is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-15-2014, 08:14 PM   #1990
Karthikdsri86
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Roswell, Ga
Posts: 5
Hi all, i am getting ready to do a 249 to 231 swap in my 98 5.9L. I found a 231 from a 96 XJ that I believe was manufactured on 12/95 as per tag. Q1. Most of my searches tell me that the input shaft for this 231 is 0.75 inches but I think I am reading 0.84 in. Do you agree looking at the pic? Q2. The 249 i currently have will most probably have a 0.84 in input, right? Which could potentially mean a direct swap? Please humor my questions due to my in experience with such jobs. Thanks.
image-2468761762.jpg

image-187948101.jpg


Last edited by Karthikdsri86; 02-15-2014 at 08:33 PM..
Karthikdsri86 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-15-2014, 09:08 PM   #1991
MurdaJs
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Woods
Posts: 1,995
Looks like .840 to me, should go right in
__________________
Built one piece at a time, and it cost me many dimes
MurdaJs is online now   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-16-2014, 09:47 AM   #1992
Myusername1674
Web Wheeler
 
Myusername1674's Avatar
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karthikdsri86 View Post
Hi all, i am getting ready to do a 249 to 231 swap in my 98 5.9L. I found a 231 from a 96 XJ that I believe was manufactured on 12/95 as per tag. Q1. Most of my searches tell me that the input shaft for this 231 is 0.75 inches but I think I am reading 0.84 in. Do you agree looking at the pic? Q2. The 249 i currently have will most probably have a 0.84 in input, right? Which could potentially mean a direct swap? Please humor my questions due to my in experience with such jobs. Thanks.
I'm thinking your 249 is going to have a longer shaft. My 95 did, with the 46rh transmission, which I THINK is similar to the 46re in your jeep.

My 249 when I pulled it out


sent from, uh
__________________
95 FiveTwo ZJ, DD, Lifted, Locked on 35s, Build (in progress)

My 5.9 swap (in progress)

Want your zj to be doorless in 60 seconds?
Myusername1674 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-17-2014, 04:33 AM   #1993
MurdaJs
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Woods
Posts: 1,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myusername1674 View Post
I'm thinking your 249 is going to have a longer shaft. My 95 did, with the 46rh transmission, which I THINK is similar to the 46re in your jeep.

My 249 when I pulled it out


sent from, uh
His 46re should have the .840. If it wasnt he could swap inout shafts since its late 95 build date.
__________________
Built one piece at a time, and it cost me many dimes
MurdaJs is online now   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-28-2014, 12:47 PM   #1994
iann32
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: naugatuck, CT
Posts: 148
I've been searching and I think I found a usable tc for sale for my swap. This is what I found. http://hartford.craigslist.org/pts/4345177207.html
I know I'm gona have to swap inputs but my question is, it should still bolt on to my tranny, correct? Also, would i still be able to use my rear drive shaft with it? I have a 95 zj with the v8 but tje tc is early 94 so I should have the early gear cut like the tc in the link.

Thanks,
Ian
iann32 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-28-2014, 11:08 PM   #1995
Myusername1674
Web Wheeler
 
Myusername1674's Avatar
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by iann32 View Post
I've been searching and I think I found a usable tc for sale for my swap. This is what I found. http://hartford.craigslist.org/pts/4345177207.html
I know I'm gona have to swap inputs but my question is, it should still bolt on to my tranny, correct? Also, would i still be able to use my rear drive shaft with it? I have a 95 zj with the v8 but tje tc is early 94 so I should have the early gear cut like the tc in the link.

Thanks,
Ian
When was your 95 actually produced? Check the date stamped on the tcase. Mine was made late 94 and had the late gear cut...

sent from, uh
__________________
95 FiveTwo ZJ, DD, Lifted, Locked on 35s, Build (in progress)

My 5.9 swap (in progress)

Want your zj to be doorless in 60 seconds?
Myusername1674 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.