Is there a Truetrac fitment for Dana 35c? - JeepForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 21 Old 02-08-2008, 11:52 AM Thread Starter
VTZJ
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VT
Posts: 99
Is there a Truetrac fitment for Dana 35c?

So I went to order a Truetrac for both my front and rear axles today, and was told by the retailer that there is no Truetrac application for my rear, a 1996 Dana 35c. Reason: too much endplay in the axles due to a 0.030 difference in cross pin diameter. Solution: custom machine work or sleeve. Ouch.

Question: Is this info correct? If you have successfully installed and operated a Truetrac in a 1996 or later ZJ, would you please tell me how it went and if possible what Truetrac model number you used?

Front Dana 30 does not seem to be a problem, but comment on this too if you have exp.

Thx.


96 ZJ 4.0, 42RE, NV242, Dana30/35c w TruTracs, stock height and tires, MM12k hydraulic winch on Hanson bumper, some armor.
VTZJ is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 21 Old 02-08-2008, 12:57 PM
mendelmax
Registered User
2004 WJ 
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland, Katowice
Posts: 1,748
What does the cross pin diameter has to do with truetrac?!

POLISH JEEP OWNERS CLUB #11

Anyway, nothing will beat Suzuki :D
mendelmax is offline  
post #3 of 21 Old 02-11-2008, 06:51 AM Thread Starter
VTZJ
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VT
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by mendelmax View Post
What does the cross pin diameter has to do with truetrac?!
That's what I said, but then, if I knew the answer to this, I wouldn't be asking for help.

So, are you just posing a question, or are you saying there is no cross pin in the Truetrac Dana 35c application?

96 ZJ 4.0, 42RE, NV242, Dana30/35c w TruTracs, stock height and tires, MM12k hydraulic winch on Hanson bumper, some armor.
VTZJ is offline  
post #4 of 21 Old 02-11-2008, 06:56 AM
mendelmax
Registered User
2004 WJ 
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland, Katowice
Posts: 1,748
I may be making some language mistake (I'm not a native English speaker), but from what I know, cross pin is the pin that holds the spider gears on their place. With truetrac you replace whole carrier, and there is no such thing as a cross pin, because the spider gears (worm gears) have rotation axis horizontally. TT is also c-clip ready as producer states, so I see no reason why it wouldn't work- they probably made it to fit as OEM. I know few people that run TT in their rear D35c and noone mentioned about any problems. Just plug&play.

Maybe your retailer was thinking about lock-right or something like that? With lunchbox lockers indeed, the cross pin diameter is very important.

POLISH JEEP OWNERS CLUB #11

Anyway, nothing will beat Suzuki :D
mendelmax is offline  
post #5 of 21 Old 02-11-2008, 07:06 AM
gomes512
Registered User
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Plaines, IL
Posts: 1,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by mendelmax View Post
Maybe your retailer was thinking about lock-right or something like that? With lunchbox lockers indeed, the cross pin diameter is very important.
Yeah that what I was thinking. Maybe they are confused?
gomes512 is offline  
post #6 of 21 Old 02-11-2008, 07:40 AM
ajmorell
Registered User
 
ajmorell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 7,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by mendelmax View Post
I may be making some language mistake (I'm not a native English speaker), but from what I know, cross pin is the pin that holds the spider gears on their place. With truetrac you replace whole carrier, and there is no such thing as a cross pin, because the spider gears (worm gears) have rotation axis horizontally. TT is also c-clip ready as producer states, so I see no reason why it wouldn't work- they probably made it to fit as OEM. I know few people that run TT in their rear D35c and noone mentioned about any problems. Just plug&play.

Maybe your retailer was thinking about lock-right or something like that? With lunchbox lockers indeed, the cross pin diameter is very important.
I didn't think the TrueTrac was a full-case locker. I thought it just replaced the spiders and not the carrier itself?
ajmorell is offline  
post #7 of 21 Old 02-11-2008, 07:51 AM
ArloGuthroJeep
Mr. Hyde!
 
ArloGuthroJeep's Avatar
2004 WJ 
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boulder
Posts: 23,086
Nah it is a full replacement: http://www.nationaldrivetrain.com/sh...ml/page44.html

'04 WJ, 6" Clayton LA's, 242 SYE, 35" BFG MT KM2's, 4.56 gears, & D44a locked
'14 WK2 Limited w/5.7L, ORAI, & Tow Package
ArloGuthroJeep is offline  
post #8 of 21 Old 02-11-2008, 08:57 AM
ajmorell
Registered User
 
ajmorell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 7,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArloGuthroJeep View Post
Shoulda kept my mouth shut. In that case the cross shaft shouldn't matter.....you could always call and ask Detroit.
ajmorell is offline  
post #9 of 21 Old 02-12-2008, 02:14 PM Thread Starter
VTZJ
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VT
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by mendelmax View Post
...cross pin is the pin that holds the spider gears on their place. With truetrac you replace whole carrier, and there is no such thing as a cross pin, because the spider gears (worm gears) have rotation axis horizontally...
Brilliantly insightful. And wrong.

If you go here http://www.eaton.com/ecm/groups/publ.../ct_128482.pdf
and scroll down to the instructions on installing truetrac in the Dana 35c, you will see that the TrueTrac for Dana 35c does indeed have a cross pin. Call it a dummy cross pin if you like -- it is there to fulfill one of the jobs that the now-missing spider gear cross pin performed. That job is to limit inward linear (co-axial) travel in the axle shafts. The C-clips limit outward travel, but are too sloppy to limit travel in both directions. So truetrac provides this dummy cross pin as a substitute. Now what I am told (by the retailer, not Eaton, mind you) is that the 94 and newer Dana 35 had a slightly larger cross pin than the older model, and the pin provided with the TrueTrac unit was sized for the older cross pin, thus is 0.030 too small, allowing 0.015 too much end play in each axle.

You learn something new every day. Every day that you spend countless hours on the internet trying to track down some arcane engineering fact about a product no one cares about and an axle everyone hates, that is.

96 ZJ 4.0, 42RE, NV242, Dana30/35c w TruTracs, stock height and tires, MM12k hydraulic winch on Hanson bumper, some armor.
VTZJ is offline  
post #10 of 21 Old 02-12-2008, 03:37 PM
mendelmax
Registered User
2004 WJ 
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland, Katowice
Posts: 1,748
That's quite interesting, I haven't thought about it that way. I will ask my friends with truetracs in Poland about it.

On the other hand, considering how much play c-clipped axles have, I find it hard to believe that extra 0.015" may matter

Maybe the best way is to ask guys at Eaton?

POLISH JEEP OWNERS CLUB #11

Anyway, nothing will beat Suzuki :D
mendelmax is offline  
post #11 of 21 Old 02-12-2008, 06:49 PM
tennesseewj
Registered User
2004 WJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,302
I would think that if it's been happening since '94 TrueTrac would have corrected the problem by now

2004 4.0 Selec-Trac
BB->Black Diamonds->General Grabbers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sporer65 View Post
You need to learn, there are 3 things that all JF members must like beside Jeeps:
(1) Guns (2) Women (3) Bacon
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraKee99 View Post
I was bored so I forded the river. No oxen were lost.
tennesseewj is offline  
post #12 of 21 Old 02-13-2008, 06:31 AM Thread Starter
VTZJ
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VT
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by mendelmax View Post
That's quite interesting, I haven't thought about it that way. I will ask my friends with truetracs in Poland about it.

On the other hand, considering how much play c-clipped axles have, I find it hard to believe that extra 0.015" may matter

Maybe the best way is to ask guys at Eaton?
1) Thank you for asking your friends. I appreciate your help, and would be very interested in any comments from your friends regarding the Truetrac (end play issue, performance, durability, capability). ZJ is my daily driver, and a family vehicle, in a snowy, icy, muddy region of the US. I need more traction both on and off road, but it must be well-mannered on the highway (so no lockers for me).

2) Good hypothesis about the extra play not mattering. However, I do wonder if it would affect the warranty from TrueTrac if I install it in an application not recommended by Eaton. Also, I'm no engineer, but seems to me that too much linear travel will, at some point, place bad thrust loads on the wheel bearings during cornering, no?

3) I have followed your suggestion and now have a phone call in to a product manager at Eaton, and will try to get some email response from them to post on this forum.

Thanks .

96 ZJ 4.0, 42RE, NV242, Dana30/35c w TruTracs, stock height and tires, MM12k hydraulic winch on Hanson bumper, some armor.

Last edited by VTZJ; 02-13-2008 at 06:40 AM. Reason: clarify meaning
VTZJ is offline  
post #13 of 21 Old 02-13-2008, 09:41 AM Thread Starter
VTZJ
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VT
Posts: 99
Resolved...for now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mendelmax View Post
Maybe the best way is to ask guys at Eaton?
Done. And here is what Eaton says.

Not all Dana 35c axles have the same cross pin diameter. Older ones were fitted with 0.685" diameter pin. Newer ones fitted with 0.716" diameter pin. Eaton product manager I spoke with says Eaton not sure which vehicles may be equipped with smaller or larger pins, so doen't claim that ZJ has this issue. May or may not.

Nevertheless, Eaton does specify TrueTrac model 912A569 for Dana 35c. THis model does come with a cross pin sized to replace the older, smaller diameter cross pin. Recommends that upon set up installer measure axle end play and if determined to be excessive, remedy by building up end of axles slightly.

96 ZJ 4.0, 42RE, NV242, Dana30/35c w TruTracs, stock height and tires, MM12k hydraulic winch on Hanson bumper, some armor.
VTZJ is offline  
post #14 of 21 Old 02-13-2008, 10:03 AM
mendelmax
Registered User
2004 WJ 
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland, Katowice
Posts: 1,748
BTW, one thing that crossed my mind- I checked part numbers for axle shafts for various years of ZJ production. The idea is simple- if the axle shafts didn't change it must mean, that either the cross pin doesn't matter for them, OR that the cross pin wasn't changed in ZJ.
And so:
98 ZJ: 4762 194 (right), 4762 195 (left)
97 ZJ: 4762 194 (right), 4762 195 (left)
94-96 ZJ: 4713 192-3 (drum brakes), 4762 194-5 (disc brakes)
93 ZJ: 4713 192-3

So, in other words, to me it sounds they are most likely the same. There is "-5" difference though, the question is, whether it was changed to keep order (there were few part number changes on exactly the same parts in Jeep history) or something really changed. Maybe it's some note about the side of the vehicle, because the parts list for 94-96 don't specify the side.

Now the other thing is that these axles were used both in grand cherokee and cherokee. I doubt that Eaton would loose the market for 96&up XJ and ZJ.

I already posted a question about this on our Polish forum, we'll see what the answer will be

POLISH JEEP OWNERS CLUB #11

Anyway, nothing will beat Suzuki :D
mendelmax is offline  
post #15 of 21 Old 02-13-2008, 12:57 PM Thread Starter
VTZJ
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VT
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by mendelmax View Post
BTW, one thing that crossed my mind- I checked part numbers for axle shafts for various years of ZJ production. The idea is simple- if the axle shafts didn't change it must mean, that either the cross pin doesn't matter for them, OR that the cross pin wasn't changed in ZJ.
You are brilliant. That is a powerful deduction. And so obvious -- after you mention it! But then, should we expect anything less from the land of Joseph Conrad and Stanslaw Lem?

96 ZJ 4.0, 42RE, NV242, Dana30/35c w TruTracs, stock height and tires, MM12k hydraulic winch on Hanson bumper, some armor.
VTZJ is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
Fitment Problems: Detroit Truetac and Dana 35c (x-posted) Brian's 97 ZJ ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 32 09-01-2009 01:15 PM
Truetrac LSD vs. Locker Situations Raitinger ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 8 12-22-2008 03:12 PM
No TrueTrac for D35, now what? TheSandman ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 44 06-01-2008 06:23 PM
Truetrac Question reward_1000 ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 4 02-27-2007 08:09 PM
truetrac or ez locker?? mudd ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 1 02-03-2004 09:21 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome