Sway bar end connections crooked? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Grand Cherokee & Commander Forums > ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum > Sway bar end connections crooked?

Smittybilt Hard Tops @ Oconee Off-Road! 706-534-9955XHD Heavy-Duty Hood Latches for JK and TJ available at OcoFS: Jeep Fog Light LED Bulbs! Several Brightness Options!

Reply
Unread 07-18-2013, 04:16 PM   #1
billyblooshoes
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Hope, PA
Posts: 77
Sway bar end connections crooked?

Something else caught me eye that doesn't quite look right. The joints where the sway bar connects on both sides looks crooked. What should I do to rectify this and what if anything will I notice as a result of this? Seems to be driving pretty good.

image-893140020.jpg

billyblooshoes is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2013, 05:02 PM   #2
newfieZJ
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: , Alberta
Posts: 6,453
looks normal . it's a ball joint connection so it has movement
newfieZJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2013, 05:51 PM   #3
dnuccio
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,484
someone installed those endlinks wrong. theres supposed to be a rubber piece under the sway bar, and another one on top of the sway bar, then the nut goes on.
__________________
Reliability is relative
R.I.P. Ratmonkey
dnuccio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2013, 06:02 PM   #4
newfieZJ
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: , Alberta
Posts: 6,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnuccio View Post
someone installed those endlinks wrong. theres supposed to be a rubber piece under the sway bar, and another one on top of the sway bar, then the nut goes on.
That applies to 93-95 , not 96-98
newfieZJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2013, 06:25 PM   #5
dnuccio
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by newfieZJ View Post
That applies to 93-95 , not 96-98
really? why would they be different?
__________________
Reliability is relative
R.I.P. Ratmonkey
dnuccio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2013, 06:46 PM   #6
newfieZJ
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: , Alberta
Posts: 6,453
93-95 used as you described , bushings , washers and a nut . 96-98 uses a ball/socket type connection . Moog sells a greasable end link . From an engineering stand point , it's probably a better design .
newfieZJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2013, 11:12 PM   #7
dnuccio
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by newfieZJ View Post
93-95 used as you described , bushings , washers and a nut . 96-98 uses a ball/socket type connection . Moog sells a greasable end link . From an engineering stand point , it's probably a better design .
huh thats interesting. could maybe be a cheap upgrade for 93-95 ZJs? wonder what the benefits would be other than being able to grease it
__________________
Reliability is relative
R.I.P. Ratmonkey
dnuccio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2013, 11:19 PM   #8
MTBlue
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Helena, MT
Posts: 1,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by newfieZJ View Post
93-95 used as you described , bushings , washers and a nut . 96-98 uses a ball/socket type connection . Moog sells a greasable end link . From an engineering stand point , it's probably a better design .
100x better! I say from experience, the Moog end links work flawlessly. Not a squeak from the front end since I've installed them, and so far they haven't budged.

To the OP: Yes, that is normal, as Newfie said.
__________________
"Sir, I don't get lost, I just discover alternative destinations!"
MTBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2013, 11:50 PM   #9
Uniblurb
Web Wheeler
 
Uniblurb's Avatar
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Central, Ohio
Posts: 3,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by newfieZJ View Post
93-95 used as you described , bushings , washers and a nut . 96-98 uses a ball/socket type connection . Moog sells a greasable end link . From an engineering stand point , it's probably a better design .
Maybe they started the ball/socket sway bar links in 97 since my 96 ZJ and son's 96 XJ both came from the factory with the straight shaft link with a couple curves in it. We were breaking them left and right, not even off-road, and in going to the Moog's w/ball joint sure fixed that problem! Nice, they are greasable too as you mentioned.
__________________
96 4.0 ZJ Laredo, 2004 4.7L WJ Limited, 93 4.0 XJ (spare), 96 4.0 XJ (son's)

-Stalling ZJ? 12 things to check before replacing a sensor; the Dirty Dozen
-Crankshaft position sensor multimeter test. & video of testing.
Uniblurb is offline   Reply With Quote




Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.