successful 242 swap. - JeepForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 Old 04-13-2013, 03:57 AM Thread Starter
ZJfamilyfun
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alpena
Posts: 172
successful 242 swap.

Took 6 hours. 1.5 to remove 249. 1.5 to install 242. 3 hrs. Drinking in between tasks. I picked up a 242 out of a 98 zj. W/ a 4.0. For $75. Bolted right up. No mods no nothing. Just remove 249 and reverse for install. Just had to adjust shift linkage...... totally awesome. Thanks for the wonderful write up.

ZJfamilyfun is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 Old 04-13-2013, 11:43 PM Thread Starter
ZJfamilyfun
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alpena
Posts: 172
Went out for a maiden voyage today, and totally loved it. Gained 3mph both city and highway!!!! Now 13.8 city 17 hwy.
ZJfamilyfun is offline  
post #3 of 5 Old 04-13-2013, 11:59 PM
dnuccio
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,483
i dont think you gained any mpg. the entire front axle components are still turning whether its in 2wd or 4wd thats what causes the decrease in fuel mileage. the only way to benefit from the 242 swap fuel economy wise is if you installed manual locking hubs, which IIRC the kit is over 1000 bucks, so its really not worth it.

Reliability is relative
R.I.P. Ratmonkey
dnuccio is offline  
post #4 of 5 Old 04-14-2013, 06:44 AM
LouC
Registered User
2007 WK 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 1,735
Agree based on my experience of running a ZJ with a 242 for 15 years. It's possible your 249 was binding up in turns and that may have lowered your mpg. I have tried running my ZJ in both 2wd and full time and there really is no difference in mpg. The nice thing about the 242, is flexibility. If you have a bad winter, you can leave it in full time. To reduce wear and tear you can run in 2 WD. Off road 4x4, part time works great, no waiting for auto engagement like other systems. One improvement I could have suggested was a Torsen differential to provide auto lock up in full time. Overall, the 242 is a great case for people who don't mind shifting for themselves.

2007 WK Limited Hemi QDII
1998 ZJ Laredo 4.0 Selectrac
LouC is offline  
post #5 of 5 Old 04-14-2013, 03:26 PM Thread Starter
ZJfamilyfun
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alpena
Posts: 172
Yeah. The VC in my 249 was wasted.....right turns on city were taken like big trucks. Nice and wide. nd we parked in the far back of parking lots to avoid having to try to make the tight maneuvers. But yes we did gain significant mpg increases. And my wife and I are old school. We don't mind pulling a lever to engage 4wd. But all in all I'm way happier.
ZJfamilyfun is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome