Quadratrac transfer case - JeepForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 Old 12-23-2001, 02:11 PM Thread Starter
phillup69
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1
Quadratrac transfer case

How difficult would it be to change out the quadratrac (NP249) transfer case to a NP242 or NP231. Would either of these 2 bolt straight into the tranmasiion? I own a 94 ZJ with the 5.2L engine. Would any driveshaft mods be needed, or any axle mods needed?


Thanks , Scott

phillup69 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 Old 01-06-2002, 02:38 PM
WharfRat123
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 15
Both will bolt right up.

Driveshaft mods will probably be needed as well as shift linkage mods.

But this is a great swap and easier than most think.

The 231 is cheaper, but I would go for the 242 if I were you, unless it never snows where you are. Not having the ability of full-time 4wd is lame IMHO.

1998 5.9L
6", 35's, Detroit/OX, L10, 4.56, Warn 9500
WharfRat123 is offline  
post #3 of 4 Old 01-07-2002, 04:06 PM
Mackskibum
Registered User
1976 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northampton, PA
Posts: 24
Wharf is right with some caveats...

You need the correct input shaft length for the bolt- up. The front output yoke needs to be from an XJ or a ZJ if you use the 231- the double cardan wont fit in the yoke of a TJ case. Also, your VIC won't work w/ the 231- the switch won't make it function, although it will work with the 242. I did not have to lengthen the driveshafts in my 231 swap, but any lift would require changes here. The linkage will require some field engineering to work on the 231, I don't know about the 242.

Good Luck

'05 GMC Envoy XL SLT
'05 F250 CC XLT 4x4
'08 535XI
'76 CJ7 project
Mackskibum is offline  
post #4 of 4 Old 01-07-2002, 08:33 PM
WharfRat123
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 15
That is true. I totally spaced on the fact that there are tow different input shaft styles.

As far as the VIC goes.....yeah that is true if it really matters to you. I don't have a whole lot of use for it, and that helps lend some back to the fact that the 242 is a better swap anyway.

1998 5.9L
6", 35's, Detroit/OX, L10, 4.56, Warn 9500
WharfRat123 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
Missing Front Drive Shaft on 249 (QuadraTrac) T-Case todd224 ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 12 04-26-2009 04:05 AM
Transfer Case zippome ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 4 02-09-2008 07:13 AM
Help, 231 for 249 transfer case fruitlandgreer ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 6 07-02-2007 10:59 PM
Can I drive my Jeep with QuadraTrac and the transfer case in neutral? 02Lightning ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 8 02-14-2006 09:34 PM
quadratrac transfer case rsoffar ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 3 01-30-2005 09:59 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome