Old Man Emu +2" - Page 2 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Grand Cherokee & Commander Forums > ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum > Old Man Emu +2"

Poison spyder items @ oconee off road 706 534 9955Introducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed LineThe Solution to Radius Arm Bind - Meet Lock-N-Load

Reply
Unread 10-01-2009, 02:51 AM   #16
CMARJEEP
Registered User
2001 WJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by WXman View Post
I disagree. If a tire is low on one corner, it's going to cause the suspension to be offset on the opposite side, and especially the opposite corner. That's why a vehicle with a flat tire sags and sits all awkward if you look at it from behind. 0 psi somewhere is going to give you much different readings hub to fender than all tires at 40 psi or whatever.
Are you just trying to argue for the hell of it? Nobody is going to measure their lift height with one flat tire and the rest inflated. It is the best and most accurate way to measure lift height.

__________________
www.norcaljeepers.co
CMARJEEP is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-01-2009, 05:52 AM   #17
WXman
Registered User
2001 WJ 
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMARJEEP View Post
Are you just trying to argue for the hell of it? Nobody is going to measure their lift height with one flat tire and the rest inflated. It is the best and most accurate way to measure lift height.

Nope, I'm not. Just trying to stop the misinformation that goes around in these forums. Measuring from the center of the hub is only as accurate as the level ground the Jeep rests on...therefore saying it's the only accurate way to do it is WRONG. I'm just tired of hearing it.

In any case, back on topic... I agree the medium duty springs will cause it to sit a little higher in the rear. So I think his condition is normal.
__________________
'92 YJ - heavily modded
'96 ZJ - heavily modded
'05 KJ CRD Limited - 370 lb./ft. from a 4-cylinder and trail ready. Pure awesomeness.
'11 Mango Tango JKU Sport - Mods
'12 Dozer JKU Sport S - 6-speed - ACE rock rails - Max Tow package - Daystar spacers - 33x12.50 Duratracs
WXman is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-01-2009, 06:03 AM   #18
Area.3.Fiftyone
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kingston, Pa. 18704, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,469
It is not wrong.

Measuring from the center of the hub is the correct way "IF" you are sitting on level ground. Obviously if one of your tires is: in a ditch, up on a rock or a ramp the reading will be different because of axle flex.

This takes tires size and inflation out of the equation.
__________________
79' CJ7 - 82' CJ8 - 94' YJ - 96' ZJ
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.......
Area.3.Fiftyone is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-01-2009, 06:31 AM   #19
JMOSS
Registered User
1999 WJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lucca - Italy
Posts: 91
From the hub it's a good idea, but from the ground is the same too, obivusly you have to do it properly:
levelled ground, tires with same pressure.....
Anyway, back to the topic: I know rear is higher with medium duty springs, the point is if that much is ok or not ok.
Normally with stoke is about 0.4, up country ones 0.4, ironman the same....i dont'have data on others brands.

1.2......it seems too be too much.

Do you know someone in the forum who has a wj with Old Man Emu Springs?

Just to compare......

Any sellers who can help me? Kolak come on, give me your opinon!
__________________
99 WJ 4.7V8 Limited QTII , LPG system, 180° Tstat, Magnaflow cat, Up country coil springs, Procomp MX6 shocks absorber, ADDCO swaybars & gresonable bushings, General Grabber AT2 tires, Usa spec pa-chr11 Ipod interface.

Last edited by JMOSS; 10-01-2009 at 07:03 AM..
JMOSS is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-01-2009, 06:44 AM   #20
Area.3.Fiftyone
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kingston, Pa. 18704, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,469
It's all your personal preference.

Having the rear slightly higher when unloaded is not a bad thing. When you put some weight in it, it will settle.

I personally like my rig to sit level unloaded or with a slight rake Rear to Front.
__________________
79' CJ7 - 82' CJ8 - 94' YJ - 96' ZJ
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.......
Area.3.Fiftyone is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-01-2009, 06:52 AM   #21
JMOSS
Registered User
1999 WJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lucca - Italy
Posts: 91
Slifgtly ok, 1.2" not seems slightly too me ....My fear is it can compromise genaral stability.

Right know i have loaded some staff too lose about 0.5 inch....and it run (handling ecc) much better.

Sometimes new springs can have problems and the company can change them....but i dont' want to boder them if not sure that it's a problem or not, or just a temporary problem.
__________________
99 WJ 4.7V8 Limited QTII , LPG system, 180° Tstat, Magnaflow cat, Up country coil springs, Procomp MX6 shocks absorber, ADDCO swaybars & gresonable bushings, General Grabber AT2 tires, Usa spec pa-chr11 Ipod interface.
JMOSS is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-12-2009, 08:49 AM   #22
JMOSS
Registered User
1999 WJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lucca - Italy
Posts: 91
any helps?
__________________
99 WJ 4.7V8 Limited QTII , LPG system, 180° Tstat, Magnaflow cat, Up country coil springs, Procomp MX6 shocks absorber, ADDCO swaybars & gresonable bushings, General Grabber AT2 tires, Usa spec pa-chr11 Ipod interface.
JMOSS is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-12-2009, 09:19 AM   #23
HighLonesome
Belief In All Things Jeep
 
HighLonesome's Avatar
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 5,685
Give them more time.

My ZJ HD OME coils have sagged over an inch since new. The OME coils aren't all they're cracked up to be.
HighLonesome is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-12-2009, 09:22 AM   #24
JMOSS
Registered User
1999 WJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lucca - Italy
Posts: 91
I hope so in this case!

tx
__________________
99 WJ 4.7V8 Limited QTII , LPG system, 180° Tstat, Magnaflow cat, Up country coil springs, Procomp MX6 shocks absorber, ADDCO swaybars & gresonable bushings, General Grabber AT2 tires, Usa spec pa-chr11 Ipod interface.
JMOSS is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.