OBD I or II ? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Grand Cherokee & Commander Forums > ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum > OBD I or II ?

Introducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed LineEngo winches available at www.rockridge4wd.com! Free shippSwag Off Road BIG-HIT TJ-YJ Rear Bumper

Reply
Unread 04-29-2012, 05:16 PM   #1
at38b
Registered User
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saint Petersburg, Florida
Posts: 31
OBD I or II ?

Evening everybody, hope you'al had a good weekend. Anyway, 94 GCL 4.0, is it obd I or II? And does anybody have an idea where the connector is? The Chrysler manual, well, it references another manual for ck'in.
Jeff

__________________
Always shoot first, then ask questions. You'll live to fight another day!
at38b is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-29-2012, 05:30 PM   #2
DeansWings
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 938
OBD 1, and I've heard it's under the hood? I donno, I've been drinking.

I believe 96 was the 1st obd II zj
__________________
'96 ZJ 4.0 NP242 5.5" Iron Rock Off Road Critical Path Long Arm sitting on 33x12.5x15 Goodyear Duratracs

'06 WK 3.7 2wd stock as a rock.

The Build:
[url]http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f22/96-zj-build-1262449/[/url]

North Texas Grands:
[url]http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f348/north-texas-grands-1323367/[/url]

Youtube wheeling vids (mostly from Bridgeport):
[url]http://www.youtube.com/user/MrDeanswings?feature=guide[/url]

Grand Slam Texas!:
[url]http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f197/grand-slam-texas-1419143/index19.html[/url]
DeansWings is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-29-2012, 06:18 PM   #3
MeanGreenZJ
Web Wheeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mean Street in a desperate part of town
Posts: 1,710
OBD-1 was never tested outside of California.

Chrysler = SCI
Ford = EEC-IV
GM = ALDL, OBD-1.5 was used in a handful of cars in 94-95.
MeanGreenZJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-29-2012, 06:25 PM   #4
Proph2010
Registered User
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 301
It is under the hood; it's just to the right of the PCM, which is in the back left portion of the engine compartment mounted to the firewall. It just a set of dangling wires with a obd1 connector plugged into a dust cover.


This is a 94 5.2 but I doubt it's different in placement.
image-386436796.jpg   image-3736388616.jpg  
Proph2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 03:10 PM   #5
at38b
Registered User
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saint Petersburg, Florida
Posts: 31
Thanks for the pics, looks to be the same, now to find a connector plug for the code reader.
Thanks again.
Jeff
__________________
Always shoot first, then ask questions. You'll live to fight another day!
at38b is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 03:18 PM   #6
SchizophrenicMC
Registered User
1997 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 1,796
94 and earlier systems use OBD-I. 96 and later are required to have OBD-II diagnostic systems, by law.

Good luck with that diagnostic.
__________________
1997 Grand Cherokee Orvis Edition - 82,000 miles

Those tow hooks aren't there for me. They're there for the XJs.
SchizophrenicMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 04:08 PM   #7
MeanGreenZJ
Web Wheeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mean Street in a desperate part of town
Posts: 1,710
95 and earlier systems use Chrysler SCI. OBD-1 LOL
MeanGreenZJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 04:21 PM   #8
SchizophrenicMC
Registered User
1997 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeanGreenZJ View Post
95 and earlier systems use Chrysler SCI. OBD-1 LOL
I don't know manufacturer specifics, only that OBD-I was in 88 models of various make, and by law, all USDM cars were required to use OBD-II in '96 :P
__________________
1997 Grand Cherokee Orvis Edition - 82,000 miles

Those tow hooks aren't there for me. They're there for the XJs.
SchizophrenicMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 04:22 PM   #9
edpmedic
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baldwin, NY Long Island
Posts: 1,050
Can't you do the key trick and read the blinks?
__________________
Never4get those who gave their lives on 09-11-01 WTC and Pentagon. FDNY-EMS-NYPD-PAPD. Also those who are still dying.
_______________________________________________
"Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed."
Martin Luther King, Jr.
_______________________________________________
"Always aim at complete harmony of thought and word and deed. Always aim at purifying your thoughts and everything will be well."
Mahatma Gandhi
_______________________________________________
Feel the Sunshine on your face
edpmedic is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 05:19 PM   #10
MeanGreenZJ
Web Wheeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mean Street in a desperate part of town
Posts: 1,710
OBD-II is a standard protocol. This is why all OBD-II code readers work on all OBD-II cars. Before OBD-II there was no standard protocol and everyone used their own system. No one had OBD-I. Chrysler used SCI, Ford used EEC-IV and MECS, GM used ALDL. That is why you can not use a Chrysler SCI code reader on a Ford or a GM like you can with OBD-II.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SchizophrenicMC View Post
I don't know manufacturer specifics, only that OBD-I was in 88 models of various make, and by law, all USDM cars were required to use OBD-II in '96 :P
MeanGreenZJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 05:39 PM   #11
5-90
Registered User
1988 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, CA, Hammerspace
Posts: 5,249
OBD-I application is kinda spotty through 1990 or so (the XJ and MJ was "pre-OBD" through the 1990 Model Year. However, the 1984-1986XJ with the GM V6 was OBD-I, since AMC bought those engines from GM with the control setup - the AMC engines were not OBD.)

OBD-I was specified by the CARB, and "caught on" nationally (nothing moves through government faster than a bad idea. OBD-I was poorly implemented and designed, and standards were about as standardised as plumbing.)

Sometime around 1994, SAE got involved and said "We'll take it from here." This is why OBD-II base codes (first numerical digit of zero) are standard, while the codes with the first numerical digit of one or two are vendor-specific. (The first digit - a letter - is used to define to which system the code applies.)

Also, the formats for the codes are standardised, so they may be assigned easily.

OBD-II effectively rolled out for the 1996 Model Year.

Also, OBD-II standardised the data transmission protocol and bus connector - OBD-I had different protocols and connectors for pretty much everybody - making it a good deal easier to interrogate the computer and find out what was wrong.

OBD-II also (in my experience) has a much lower error rate with self-diagnosis, I've had to repair several OBD-I equipped vehicles that threw codes that were just plain wrong.

(In any case, relying on the code without thinking about it is a mistake. A DTC will tell you the system where a problem may be found, it doesn't tell you what that problem is. It can't tell the difference between a wiring fault, a ground fault, or a failed sensor; you still have to do that. And, from what I've seen of recent auto tech training, that isn't being highlighted. That's why I tend to call them "techs" instead of "mechanics.")
__________________
"recon" (sic - reckon)(tm) "hihgly"(tm) "seceed"(tm)
"Outback AIDS - Alcohol-Induced Dizzy Spells"
5-90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 06:59 PM   #12
SchizophrenicMC
Registered User
1997 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeanGreenZJ View Post
OBD-II is a standard protocol. This is why all OBD-II code readers work on all OBD-II cars. Before OBD-II there was no standard protocol and everyone used their own system. No one had OBD-I. Chrysler used SCI, Ford used EEC-IV and MECS, GM used ALDL. That is why you can not use a Chrysler SCI code reader on a Ford or a GM like you can with OBD-II.
Just throwing out what I know. My '94 GMC uses OBD-I, for example. And I've seen at least one '88 GMC with OBD-I. I could swear I read something about Mazdas and OBD-I, for that matter.
__________________
1997 Grand Cherokee Orvis Edition - 82,000 miles

Those tow hooks aren't there for me. They're there for the XJs.
SchizophrenicMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 09:34 PM   #13
MeanGreenZJ
Web Wheeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mean Street in a desperate part of town
Posts: 1,710
I hate to tell ya what ever it is, it isn't much. 94-95 GMC Sierra 1500 was ALDL, who's been lying to you? Read some more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SchizophrenicMC View Post
Just throwing out what I know. My '94 GMC uses OBD-I, for example. And I've seen at least one '88 GMC with OBD-I. I could swear I read something about Mazdas and OBD-I, for that matter.
MeanGreenZJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 10:10 PM   #14
jnicewan
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,932
I think the deal is a lot of people consider anything older than OBD-2 to be OBD-1, when actually there wasn't a true OBD-1, it was more of a though that led to the creation of OBD-2. All the diagnostic systems for cars before OBD-2 was independant and somewhat proprietary (no standard protocols).

I really dont see the point in arguing about it, maybe people should just say "pre OBD-2" or something to that effect.
jnicewan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-01-2012, 10:13 PM   #15
MeanGreenZJ
Web Wheeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mean Street in a desperate part of town
Posts: 1,710
I'm just having fun with a young noob.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jnicewan View Post
I think the deal is a lot of people consider anything older than OBD-2 to be OBD-1, when actually there wasn't a true OBD-1, it was more of a though that led to the creation of OBD-2. All the diagnostic systems for cars before OBD-2 was independant and somewhat proprietary (no standard protocols).

I really dont see the point in arguing about it, maybe people should just say "pre OBD-2" or something to that effect.
MeanGreenZJ is offline   Reply With Quote




Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.