manual hub conversion for 98 grand - JeepForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 6 Old 01-26-2005, 08:59 AM Thread Starter
kemicalburns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central Orygun
Posts: 192
manual hub conversion for 98 grand

I just purchased a 98 limited 5.9ltr grand. it has the quadratac tcase thats fulltime 4wd. is there a manual hub conversion for this so im not in 4wd all day long.


98 limited
5.9ltr
stock
2.5" exhaust flowmaster
kemicalburns is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 6 Old 01-26-2005, 10:09 AM
PumaZJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,437
you could swap out the transfer case to a 231 or a 242 which gives you the option of being in 2wd. As for putting manual hubs on the front end I think that cost around not worth it dollars. Give or take.

1998 ZJ - 36's & bent unibody - RIP
2004 WJ - Expedition build
2011 A4 - DD
PumaZJ is offline  
post #3 of 6 Old 01-26-2005, 05:47 PM
driabyor
Registered User
 
driabyor's Avatar
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: chilton-haynes<$20
Posts: 2,450
actually i dont think that it is possible... if you put locking hubs on the front then the v/c would think that you have lost traction , thus your v/c would be engaged all the time.... right now you are only in four wheel drive only when the rear wheels slip..under normal conditions it is in 2 wheel drive

i could be wrong but i dont think so
driabyor is offline  
post #4 of 6 Old 01-26-2005, 08:12 PM
Texas ZJ1
Jeep Jedi Master
 
Texas ZJ1's Avatar
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Omaha
Posts: 20,349
1. You bought the biggest gas eater of all the V8s in the Jeep family.
2. Knowing this, why the sudden interest in saving gas?


The 249 is a great piece of gear. Mine lasted about 145K miles. (100K non stock)

You will find that the 1 mpg of gas that you save with a 242 is not a viable option to save money on gas. If you were upgrading your axles to currie 44s or currie 60s then, yeah. If not, it is a waste of time. You aren't wearing anything out or hurting your mileage.

How do I know this? I've been driving Grands for 11 years.

Hunter

04 4.7 HO, limited

08 Z71 Suburban, front leveling kit with rear spacers. 285/65 18s Nitto TerraGrappler G2s

94 5.9 Laredo 6.5 RE lift with 35 Maxxis Bighorns
and 33 Bridgestone Duelers
Detroit and true trac
Red Jeep Club Member
REDNECK JCM
Texas Jeep Owner #6
USN Jeep Club #4

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

602.841.3355

For your performance needs:


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

480.998.366
Texas ZJ1 is offline  
post #5 of 6 Old 01-26-2005, 09:16 PM Thread Starter
kemicalburns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central Orygun
Posts: 192
i had asked this question before i understood how this perticular tcase operated. I thought it was in 4wd all the time but later found out that it only turns the front when the rear slips. so normal driving it stays in 2wd. this is fine. as for being the biggest gas guzzler i couldnt agree more. but thankfully my wife will be driving it more an she has a very light right foot.

98 limited
5.9ltr
stock
2.5" exhaust flowmaster
kemicalburns is offline  
post #6 of 6 Old 01-26-2005, 09:31 PM
PumaZJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas ZJ1
1. You bought the biggest gas eater of all the V8s in the Jeep family.
2. Knowing this, why the sudden interest in saving gas?


The 249 is a great piece of gear. Mine lasted about 145K miles. (100K non stock)

You will find that the 1 mpg of gas that you save with a 242 is not a viable option to save money on gas. If you were upgrading your axles to currie 44s or currie 60s then, yeah. If not, it is a waste of time. You aren't wearing anything out or hurting your mileage.

How do I know this? I've been driving Grands for 11 years.

Hunter
You're a lucky one. Most people dont get over 100k before their VC starts acting up. The 249 is not terrible but if I had one in a trail rig it would definatley get swapped out. Theres virtually no aftermarket for the 249 and not worth the time and money if you ever have to swap out the internal gears or the VC.

1998 ZJ - 36's & bent unibody - RIP
2004 WJ - Expedition build
2011 A4 - DD
PumaZJ is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
ZJ 4.0 auto to manual conversion officerholbrook ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 4 08-15-2009 07:41 AM
Help with conversion to manual tranny Jonesy ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 1 03-24-2008 12:09 PM
93 zj manual conversion TheAngus ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 4 10-18-2006 07:18 PM
conversion kit? manual locking hubs? weaksauce ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 10 03-20-2006 03:48 PM
Manual tranny in Grand? 7tiger7 ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 6 12-06-2005 09:08 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome