manual hub conversion for 98 grand - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Grand Cherokee & Commander Forums > ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum > manual hub conversion for 98 grand

Savvy Billet LED Tail LightsLight up the holidays with LED lights from JeepHutIntroducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed Line

Reply
Unread 01-26-2005, 08:59 AM   #1
kemicalburns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central Orygun
Posts: 192
manual hub conversion for 98 grand

I just purchased a 98 limited 5.9ltr grand. it has the quadratac tcase thats fulltime 4wd. is there a manual hub conversion for this so im not in 4wd all day long.

__________________
98 limited
5.9ltr
stock
2.5" exhaust flowmaster
kemicalburns is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 01-26-2005, 10:09 AM   #2
PumaZJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RVA
Posts: 1,312
you could swap out the transfer case to a 231 or a 242 which gives you the option of being in 2wd. As for putting manual hubs on the front end I think that cost around not worth it dollars. Give or take.
__________________
1998 ZJ - 2004 WJ - 1981 FJ60 - 2004 Audi A4

http://www.mallcrawlin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4421
PumaZJ is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 01-26-2005, 05:47 PM   #3
driabyor
Registered User
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: chilton-haynes<$20
Posts: 2,450
actually i dont think that it is possible... if you put locking hubs on the front then the v/c would think that you have lost traction , thus your v/c would be engaged all the time.... right now you are only in four wheel drive only when the rear wheels slip..under normal conditions it is in 2 wheel drive

i could be wrong but i dont think so
driabyor is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 01-26-2005, 08:12 PM   #4
Texas ZJ1
Jeep Jedi Master
 
Texas ZJ1's Avatar
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 20,135
1. You bought the biggest gas eater of all the V8s in the Jeep family.
2. Knowing this, why the sudden interest in saving gas?


The 249 is a great piece of gear. Mine lasted about 145K miles. (100K non stock)

You will find that the 1 mpg of gas that you save with a 242 is not a viable option to save money on gas. If you were upgrading your axles to currie 44s or currie 60s then, yeah. If not, it is a waste of time. You aren't wearing anything out or hurting your mileage.

How do I know this? I've been driving Grands for 11 years.

Hunter
__________________
00 4.7 Laredo...stock

94 5.9 Laredo 6.5 RE lift with 35 Maxxis Bighorns
and 33 Bridgestone Duelers
Detroit and true trac
Red Jeep Club Member
REDNECK JCM
Texas Jeep Owner #6
USN Jeep Club #4
http://www.kevinsoffroad.com/
602.841.3355

For your performance needs:

kolak@kolakperformance.com
480.998.3661
Texas ZJ1 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 01-26-2005, 09:16 PM   #5
kemicalburns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central Orygun
Posts: 192
i had asked this question before i understood how this perticular tcase operated. I thought it was in 4wd all the time but later found out that it only turns the front when the rear slips. so normal driving it stays in 2wd. this is fine. as for being the biggest gas guzzler i couldnt agree more. but thankfully my wife will be driving it more an she has a very light right foot.
__________________
98 limited
5.9ltr
stock
2.5" exhaust flowmaster
kemicalburns is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 01-26-2005, 09:31 PM   #6
PumaZJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RVA
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas ZJ1
1. You bought the biggest gas eater of all the V8s in the Jeep family.
2. Knowing this, why the sudden interest in saving gas?


The 249 is a great piece of gear. Mine lasted about 145K miles. (100K non stock)

You will find that the 1 mpg of gas that you save with a 242 is not a viable option to save money on gas. If you were upgrading your axles to currie 44s or currie 60s then, yeah. If not, it is a waste of time. You aren't wearing anything out or hurting your mileage.

How do I know this? I've been driving Grands for 11 years.

Hunter
You're a lucky one. Most people dont get over 100k before their VC starts acting up. The 249 is not terrible but if I had one in a trail rig it would definatley get swapped out. Theres virtually no aftermarket for the 249 and not worth the time and money if you ever have to swap out the internal gears or the VC.
__________________
1998 ZJ - 2004 WJ - 1981 FJ60 - 2004 Audi A4

http://www.mallcrawlin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4421
PumaZJ is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.