M1 inlet on it's own: noticable difference? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Grand Cherokee & Commander Forums > ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum > M1 inlet on it's own: noticable difference?

Savvy/Currie Aluminum Control ArmsROCK BOTTOM prices on LIFT KITS at Rockridge4wd!! WANT TO December Specials at Jeephut.com

Reply
Unread 09-02-2009, 05:10 AM   #1
vanderputtens
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Holland
Posts: 65
M1 inlet on it's own: noticable difference?

I should be receiving my M1 inlet soon and in anticipation of fitting it I was wondering if I will notice any difference at all on my 5.9?

If so what will I notice?

vanderputtens is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 09-02-2009, 12:45 PM   #2
driabyor
Registered User
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: chilton-haynes<$20
Posts: 2,450
fuel mileage probably not .... power & torque depends on the specs.....
biggest difference will be in your walllet....thinner
__________________
94 Grand Cherokee ... 332,000 miles
5.2 liter 242 :)
Rancho 5000 steering stabilizer
driabyor is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 09-02-2009, 02:04 PM   #3
ratmonkey
R.I.P.
 
ratmonkey's Avatar
1997 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: , Pennsylvania
Posts: 19,794
you'll get a hp increase, powerband will climb upwards a few hundred rpm so it may seem like a low end power loss. mileage may increase slightly.
__________________
'97 zj 5.2, some stuff, some other suff, and some things that even work sometimes.

ratmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 09-02-2009, 02:14 PM   #4
tirus89
Registered User
1993 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,232
you can get a turtle to fix the low end power loss though.
__________________
Im a college graduate and employed and have a Haynes.

//93 ZJ//5.2L//NP249//K&N Fipk Gen II//2" BB w/BD AT Shocks//4.10's//31" Cooper Discovery STT's//Cstm Frnt Bmpr//Custom Rear Tube Bmpr//3" Magnaflow exhaust w/high flow cat//500RMS Pioneer Amp//600RMS 12" JL Audio Sub//
tirus89 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 09-16-2009, 03:17 AM   #5
vanderputtens
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Holland
Posts: 65
Well that doesn't sound to enthusiastic...I was under the impression that the M1 was a pretty big important thing overall when modding the Jeep power-wise?
vanderputtens is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 09-16-2009, 05:24 AM   #6
comptiger5000
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Stamford, CT / Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,357
Yes, but often mods work together, and some aren't very effective on their own, but help another mod work better.
comptiger5000 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 09-16-2009, 12:03 PM   #7
GrandHokie96
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waynesboro, PA
Posts: 158
is the M1 the only performance mod you'll have on it?

if so, like already stated, you may not notice it as much. I had CAI, bored TB, full 3" exhaust, and tune before i did the M1 and i could instantly feel the difference. but i dont know how it would be on a stock engine.
__________________
'98 Grand Cherokee 5.9L V8
-Stock suspension, 235/75R15 BFG AT's, AR767 rims with 4" BS - Fastman 52mm Throttle Body, K&N FIPK Gen 2, Kolak Exhaust, DMH Cutout, DT Headers, M1 Intake - 8300k 9004 Hi/Low HID's, 8000k H3 Off-Road Lamps - Rockford Fosgate P8002 and P4004 amps, 2x 12" Kicker CVR subs, Kicker SS56.2 components in Q-Logic kickpods, Front and rear Punch components, another set of components in the sound bar, 3600 watts total
GrandHokie96 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 09-16-2009, 01:17 PM   #8
tirus89
Registered User
1993 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,232
The M1 Allows more air flow, so if your using a stock TB, your only getting in so much air, thus a bottle neck. Yes there will be some power gained, but the M1 is to be coupled with a TB and free flowing intake of your choice. Even then if you want your low-end power back a turtle is going to be needed for the M1. I'd rather suggest a stock intake thats ported or a "ported kegger".
__________________
Im a college graduate and employed and have a Haynes.

//93 ZJ//5.2L//NP249//K&N Fipk Gen II//2" BB w/BD AT Shocks//4.10's//31" Cooper Discovery STT's//Cstm Frnt Bmpr//Custom Rear Tube Bmpr//3" Magnaflow exhaust w/high flow cat//500RMS Pioneer Amp//600RMS 12" JL Audio Sub//
tirus89 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 09-16-2009, 01:26 PM   #9
vanderputtens
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Holland
Posts: 65
Well I planned other mods as well such as a larger TB and headers coupled to a Kolak exhaust.
it just so happened that the M1's were in short supply so I thought I get one before it would be hard to get so to say...I do realise that mods tend to add up to eachother though!
vanderputtens is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 09-16-2009, 06:07 PM   #10
ratmonkey
R.I.P.
 
ratmonkey's Avatar
1997 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: , Pennsylvania
Posts: 19,794
then buy it, it's a great piece(the hughes edelbrock airgap they modify is great too and not going anywhere soon).
__________________
'97 zj 5.2, some stuff, some other suff, and some things that even work sometimes.

ratmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 09-16-2009, 09:33 PM   #11
newfieZJ
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: , Alberta
Posts: 6,515
I think you'll see more of an improvement than the others have said , If your intake is stock , the probability of a leaking plenum is extremely high w/o a hughes plate . The vacumn leak alone in a power loss . M1's have a one pc design , no plate , to me , that's worth the cost right there .

Your on the right track
newfieZJ is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-05-2009, 05:13 AM   #12
vanderputtens
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Holland
Posts: 65
BTW. What's a turtle???
vanderputtens is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.