The Definitive Injector Swap HOW TO - Page 28 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Grand Cherokee & Commander Forums > ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum > The Definitive Injector Swap HOW TO

Introducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed LineHalloween Savings to die for!We have Engo 10k Synthetic IN STOCK!!! Hurry while supplie

Reply
Unread 03-04-2013, 07:09 PM   #406
Uniblurb
Web Wheeler
 
Uniblurb's Avatar
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Central, Ohio
Posts: 3,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Primordial View Post
Well I returned the 703s I paid too much for and got two sets of 8 injectors from another junkyard that I get better deals at...one set is of the 710 variety and the other are the blue top 24# injectors out of a 32 valve DOHC Lincoln. The blue tops are the single pintle type but can flow a bit more if I'm not mistaken. Would these be too much for the 4.0 though? With either of them I was thinking about getting a set of injector rebuild kits since some of the pintle caps have seen better shape and I figure why not freshen them up before I drop them in. What are your thoughts? Go with the 710s or the blue tops? Or go with the 710s now and the blue tops later after some mods are done?
Not sure about what the flow rate would figure on specs for the 700-710's (same specs) in using your 39psi system. But when I suggested using the 700-710's on my 96 4.0 49psi ratmonkey shot that idea down as can be seen below. Guess the difference in plugging the specs into the forumula/chart at 49psi the 3.8 lb/hr decrease in flow rate (700-710 - 19.4 lb/hr vs OE 23.2 lb/hr) is just too much of a flow rate decrease.

http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f13/i.../#post14183886

__________________
96 4.0 ZJ Laredo, 2004 4.7L WJ Limited, 93 4.0 XJ (spare), 96 4.0 XJ (son's)

-Stalling ZJ? 12 things to check before replacing a sensor; the Dirty Dozen
-Crankshaft position sensor multimeter test. & video of testing.
Uniblurb is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-04-2013, 09:57 PM   #407
Primordial
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 237
I'm not sure on the 710s either...still doing some digging. I did find out some info on the other injectors I picked up though. They are rated at 24 lb/hr at 39.15 psi delta. Apparently (according to Ford) that's the pressure they rate all their injectors at. So it looks like the blue tops might provide a little more room as I start to add other goodies and push the limits of the stock injectors. I don't think it would hurt anything to go ahead and run them now, but I just won't get the full effect if you will until later. Now I just need to pick up some rebuild kits.
Primordial is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-05-2013, 06:49 AM   #408
PolkaPower
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Abyss, MD
Posts: 16,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Primordial View Post
I'm not sure on the 710s either...still doing some digging. I did find out some info on the other injectors I picked up though. They are rated at 24 lb/hr at339.15 psi delta. Apparently (according to Ford) that's the pressure they rate all their injectors at. So it looks like the blue tops might provide a little more room as I start to add other goodies and push the limits of the stock injectors. I don't think it would hurt anything to go ahead and run them now, but I just won't get the full effect if you will until later. Now I just need to pick up some rebuild kits.
Ok well there is a guy up the street from me with a 5.9. He's got the M1 intake, exhaust, upgraded ignition, and K&N or something like that. He also has the 710 injectors but his truck is running rich. You can smell it. It sounds great but you can for sure smell gas. You think the 710's are dumping to much fuel in?
PolkaPower is online now   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-05-2013, 09:00 AM   #409
Primordial
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolkaPower View Post
Ok well there is a guy up the street from me with a 5.9. He's got the M1 intake, exhaust, upgraded ignition, and K&N or something like that. He also has the 710 injectors but his truck is running rich. You can smell it. It sounds great but you can for sure smell gas. You think the 710's are dumping to much fuel in?
Possibly. Were the injectors installed right from the junkyard or were they cleaned and rebuilt? It sounds like what happened on a TJ I used to have that had a leaky injector. It ran great but had so much fuel coming out the exhaust manifold got so hot it cracked.
Primordial is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-05-2013, 09:24 AM   #410
PolkaPower
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Abyss, MD
Posts: 16,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Primordial View Post
Possibly. Were the injectors installed right from the junkyard or were they cleaned and rebuilt? It sounds like what happened on a TJ I used to have that had a leaky injector. It ran great but had so much fuel coming out the exhaust manifold got so hot it cracked.
I'm not sure but you would have to be pretty careless to toss them in right out of the yard. His pipe is covered with black soot.
PolkaPower is online now   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-05-2013, 10:13 AM   #411
Uniblurb
Web Wheeler
 
Uniblurb's Avatar
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Central, Ohio
Posts: 3,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolkaPower View Post
Ok well there is a guy up the street from me with a 5.9. He's got the M1 intake, exhaust, upgraded ignition, and K&N or something like that. He also has the 710 injectors but his truck is running rich. You can smell it. It sounds great but you can for sure smell gas. You think the 710's are dumping to much fuel in?
He must be having some other type of problem Polka since the 710's should be running too lean instead of running rich or dumping too much fuel in. On the OE Seimen's 778's in the 98 5.9 they are rated at 23.7 lbhr @ 49psi while the 710's are only rated at 19.4 lbhr @ 49psi. As already mentioned this is a 3.8 lbhr decrease in flow rate which is too low/lean.
__________________
96 4.0 ZJ Laredo, 2004 4.7L WJ Limited, 93 4.0 XJ (spare), 96 4.0 XJ (son's)

-Stalling ZJ? 12 things to check before replacing a sensor; the Dirty Dozen
-Crankshaft position sensor multimeter test. & video of testing.
Uniblurb is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-06-2013, 07:19 AM   #412
RJZJ
Registered User
1993 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Robinson Creek, KY
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJZJ View Post
Ok just did the 703 swap on my 93 4.0 last night, idles a lil rough and runs like sh*t driving, running rich also, I saw the post about driving to give the pcm time to "learn" the new injectors. OK not a prob put 30 miles on it today and same running characteristics so far.
Here is my question/problem, Have any of you guys had a hard time starting after the swap, I have to hold the pedal down to get it to start after it sits for about 5 minutes, if I start it let it run and cut it off and start it back immediatly no problems, but after sitting it wont start right up. Any thoughts?
Any help here guys? Update I have put 117 miles on it with no change
__________________
93 ZJ, 3.5 RC lift, 31x10.50x15, 3/4 coil spacers, bilstein 5100's, Kolak 2.5 exhaust, 703 injectors, bedliner paint job, clear front lights , Black Magic's on bumper and a pillars
RJZJ is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-06-2013, 12:41 PM   #413
Uniblurb
Web Wheeler
 
Uniblurb's Avatar
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Central, Ohio
Posts: 3,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJZJ View Post
Any help here guys? Update I have put 117 miles on it with no change
Not sure if the 93 ECU learns the same as the 96 PCM for the 703's. But have you tried removing the neg battery cable again, turn the key clear over to the right for 30 secs or leave it disconnected overnight, then reconnect the battery cable?

Have you done a fuel pressure test because it sounds like your fuel pressure is bleeding off/back since it won't start back up right away? Not sure what the spec is for the 93 4.0 39psi ZJ system but for the 93 4.0 39spi XJ it shouldn't bleed off more than 20psi after the engine is shut down for 30 min. Indicator the check valve in the top of the fuel pump assembly is bad if it does unless you have a leak somewhere else.

Did you happen to remove the tube going from the fuel pressure regulator on the rail to the intake when replacing the injectors and is it still in good shape? Know there's also 3-rings (OE-Package, Regulator O-ring, #4418903) on your fuel pressure regulator (OE #53030001, 93 4.0) where it attaches to the rail. Maybe spray some carb cleaner, or starting fluid when engines cold, on this area to see if your engine rpms pick up if it's leaking/sucking in air.

Just some suggestions and good luck.
__________________
96 4.0 ZJ Laredo, 2004 4.7L WJ Limited, 93 4.0 XJ (spare), 96 4.0 XJ (son's)

-Stalling ZJ? 12 things to check before replacing a sensor; the Dirty Dozen
-Crankshaft position sensor multimeter test. & video of testing.
Uniblurb is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-10-2013, 07:24 PM   #414
RJZJ
Registered User
1993 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Robinson Creek, KY
Posts: 78
Figured out the problem one of the.703s was bad wouldn't close kept leaking fuel changed it out for a new one and it runs like a dream now smooth idle and driving
__________________
93 ZJ, 3.5 RC lift, 31x10.50x15, 3/4 coil spacers, bilstein 5100's, Kolak 2.5 exhaust, 703 injectors, bedliner paint job, clear front lights , Black Magic's on bumper and a pillars
RJZJ is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-20-2013, 11:44 AM   #415
oldZJdog95018
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Felton, CA
Posts: 28
I found these on ebay and they appear to be new Bosch 0280155703 @ $24.95 each (seems like good price for new)

http://www.ebay.com/itm/330657234572...84.m1423.l2649

The part number reads on the casting 05277739AB , not just 05277739A. Does anyone know if they are both equivalent to the Bosch 0280155703? I found the P/N 05277739A posted on this thread as an equivalent, I just wasn't sure what the B at the end means.

I have 96 ZJ w/4.0L
oldZJdog95018 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-20-2013, 12:08 PM   #416
dnuccio
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,484
Add me to the confirmed list for 703s on a 95 5.2, the swap has been working great for me so far
__________________
Reliability is relative
R.I.P. Ratmonkey
dnuccio is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-20-2013, 12:16 PM   #417
zander21510
Lord of Retro Machines
 
zander21510's Avatar
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnuccio View Post
Add me to the confirmed list for 703s on a 95 5.2, the swap has been working great for me so far
Added
zander21510 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-20-2013, 12:17 PM   #418
zander21510
Lord of Retro Machines
 
zander21510's Avatar
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldZJdog95018 View Post
I found these on ebay and they appear to be new Bosch 0280155703 @ $24.95 each (seems like good price for new)

http://www.ebay.com/itm/330657234572...84.m1423.l2649

The part number reads on the casting 05277739AB , not just 05277739A. Does anyone know if they are both equivalent to the Bosch 0280155703? I found the P/N 05277739A posted on this thread as an equivalent, I just wasn't sure what the B at the end means.

I have 96 ZJ w/4.0L
As far as I could see from searching there is no difference. Odds are the A/AB are just minor revisions or could identify manufacturing process or something else, they are the same injector if they have the same number.
zander21510 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-21-2013, 10:28 AM   #419
Mity White 96
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 48
Add me to the confirmed list for 703's on a 96 5.2. The swap has worked perfectly for me right "out of the gate".

I own a 1996 ZJ Grand Cherokee 5.2. I followed this forum in replacing my stock injectors with the Bosch 0280155703 just yesterday. Found a vendor on eBay offering rebuilt 703 injectors in a set of six (6) and sent him a message asking for a set of eight (8) which he immediately offered back online. I paid about $174 delivered for the set. I had positive results immediately from the installation. Even from starting the engine idled more smoothly. So far I have not had the impression of any more power or even more responsiveness but rather just much greater smoothness, virtually as though the engine is brand new (at 170K miles!). I have yet to test mileage but I fully expect an improvement.

The installation also offered me an opportunity to clean out the grunge that had permeated the throttle body butterflies and their bores. Surprising amount of yuck to be found there which can't help mileage either.

I used Q-tips soaked in carburetor cleaner to clean out the residue in the intake manifold bores where the injectors are inserted. That worked pretty well but I had a huge panic attack when I accidentally dropped one into the open bore. Fortunately there was enough still showing from inside the manifold that I could extract it with tweezers but I shudder to think what would have been the course of action otherwise!

The biggest hint I can think of for the re-installation of the injector clips is to realize you can rotate the injectors around at least 90 degrees and install the retaining clips on the backside before rotating them forward into position. Makes a huge difference in overall ease of installation. Other tips. I simply used 3-In-1 oil on the seals which seemed to work perfectly well and was super easy to dispense. The biggest difficulty with this whole installation involves all the cleaning up of the accumulated crud and debris that surrounds the injectors and particularly their recepticles in the intake manifold. I used rags and WD40 to get a lot of the area clean then went back with a vacuum cleaner to suck up as much loose stuff as possible. I kept the vacuum cleaner at a standby and used it several times during the course of the installation to make sure no excessive debris fell into the open bores once the injectors had been removed.

One of the first things I did when I started work on the project was to remove the fuel pump relay then I ran the engine for several crank over's in order to burn off pressure in the fuel rail. I should have continued that for about 15-20 seconds perhaps but my battery was starting to crank down. The more you "burn off" in this fashion the less that dumps out when you dislodge the injectors from the fuel rail. I also used the Schraeder pressure valve to help reduce fuel in fuel rail as well.

The whole project lasted about 5 hours overall during which I had the battery disconnected and the ignition switch turned on. After completing the installation I didn't wait overnight but rather reconnected the battery and started the Jeep. It worked perfectly. The point is that I did not keep the battery or car's electrical system disconnected overnight nor did I apparently need to do so. Evidently a minimum of five (5) hours of disconnect time was all that was required for my vehicle to internally reset whatever was needed.

Thanks to all for the guidance and assistance for this project. I'm completely pleased with the result and recommend others to take on the project if they have the confidence in their own mechanical skills to do so.
Mity White 96 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-21-2013, 04:06 PM   #420
zander21510
Lord of Retro Machines
 
zander21510's Avatar
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,824
Very descriptive post! I added you.

We only need 1 more success to confirm '95 5.2 w/703s; and 2 more successes to confirm the 5.9. Every other combo is confirmed!

It all makes you wonder why they didn't use 4-holes in the first place lol
zander21510 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Tags
703 , 715 , ford , fuel injector , neon , swap

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.