Considering K&N FIPK for 5.2 ZJ ?? -
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 Old 01-07-2006, 12:53 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Unionville, CT
Posts: 72
Considering K&N FIPK for 5.2 ZJ ??

I'll be installing a Kolak 3" catback soon and I'm also considering the K&N FIPK. I've read a pile of old threads on this, but can't make a decision on spending $200+ based on what I've read. This will only be on road, no watercrossings. I don't mind a little sound, but I don' t want to sound like a shop vac either.

Feedback please from those of you who have the K&N FIPK with, or without a catback upgrade. And dowssides? Is this really HP you can feel in everyday driving?

Thanks for intake input,

bobiam is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 4 Old 01-07-2006, 02:14 PM
ChicagoGuy's Avatar
2008 JK Wrangler 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Woodinville
Posts: 1,444
Have the FIPK and a catback exhaust (Gibson) on mine, along with a bunch of other perf mods, and overall, other than sound/feel, probably not a significant help, but not anything that would hurt.

By itself, I think a replacement open-air box is a waste of money, but with a fully re-plumbed intake/exhaust, it isn't a bad idea.

If nothing else, just adding bigger rolling stock or armor will more than offset any actual gains. But if you are going to do exhaust, consider a free-flow cat, headers, and then, yeah, a K&N intake kit or equivalent.

- Bill (formerly VetteDriver)
ChicagoGuy is offline  
post #3 of 4 Old 01-07-2006, 05:23 PM
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Belle, WV
Posts: 4,930
I've got Mike Leach headers, full 3" stainless exhaust, Carsound cat, FM 70, Mopar Performance ECU, and FIPK on a 5.2.
Quite frankly, I have been considering going back to the stock air box with a K&N filter (or other high flow brand).
It's a given that the stock exhaust is restrictive, but I'm not so sure about the stock intake. Of course, I don't have any flow measuring devices handy to compare the two systems in real world operation, but I have a sneaking suspicion the stock airbox doesn't take much of a performance hit, if any, and almost certainly not enough to justify the added expense and higher maintainence requirements of the open filter.


Black 1996 5.2L ZJ Limited
Meerkat is offline  
post #4 of 4 Old 01-07-2006, 10:11 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Unionville, CT
Posts: 72
Thanks, guys.....That's the feedback I needed. I'm saving my money!!!

bobiam is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
K&N FIPK bacaruda ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 9 12-01-2005 04:18 AM
K&n Fipk bacaruda ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 3 11-28-2005 04:38 AM
K&N FIPK blizzboy283 ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 22 10-04-2005 09:31 PM
K & N FIPK Death-Mobile ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 2 09-11-2005 09:05 PM
K&N FIPK canadia_driver ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 5 04-06-2005 07:31 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome