2000 GC reliability? - JeepForum.com
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 8 Old 09-30-2009, 01:19 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 13
2000 GC reliability?

My parents are looking to sell there 2000 Limited4.7. It has low miles at 79,000. Just replaced was rear axle seals and brakes, tranny fluid flushed with new filters and front pinion leak fixed.
Anyway I need a DD because my procharged WS6 won't cut it in the snow. This will not be used to tow just a DD. My question is will this hold up for the long haul with regular maintenance? I don't want something that is going to nickel and dime me(already have one)!


JC70SS is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 8 Old 09-30-2009, 01:27 PM
ezflip's Avatar
2011 JK Wrangler 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,200
Short answer: probably will be fine.

The real nickels and dimes come when you start itching to mod it.

ezflip is offline  
post #3 of 8 Old 09-30-2009, 01:40 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 13
no mods! If it doesn't have 600hp at the wheels it doesn't excite me
JC70SS is offline  
post #4 of 8 Old 09-30-2009, 01:43 PM
Registered User
1999 WJ 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 129
If you can work on it yourself then it will be fine.

If you can't, and have a lot of money, then it will be fine.

Otherwise, pass.

Or put some all season tires on that Firebird. Michelin Pilot Sport All Season or Goodyear Eagle F1 All Season. I've passed stuck SUV's in the snow with my C5 using those. They work pretty well in the summer, too.
RevNL is offline  
post #5 of 8 Old 09-30-2009, 01:45 PM
Registered User
2002 KJ Liberty 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vermont
Posts: 107
I'd say you'll probably be fine. Jeep builds a pretty reliable vehicle. I just sold my old one which was a '88 with 211k on the odo. So your good for 130,000 more miles!
VT_WJ_2000 is offline  
post #6 of 8 Old 09-30-2009, 02:19 PM
Registered User
2006 WK 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 567
thats a nice vehicle for a DD. There's nothing glaring wrong with the drivetrain in these vehicles. Some annoyances, like AC evaporators, blend doors, tail light housings, head light fogging, etc. Engine and Transmissions are solid. Body rust is almost never a problem. Price should be very reasonable and they look great

2000 Red Laredo WJ
4.0 with Selec-trac - Sold
2006 Black Laredo WK
3.7 with 95,000 Miles
00RedWJ is offline  
post #7 of 8 Old 09-30-2009, 06:32 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Columbus
Posts: 1,546
my 2000 limited with an I6 has been great. I'm at 160K No engine or trans work. Rebuilt both diffs, replaced blend door with heater treater, new water pump, new elec fan unit for rad fan, a few other annoyances but nothing major.

Very reliable and easy to work on.
cmonson is offline  
post #8 of 8 Old 10-01-2009, 07:06 AM
Registered User
1999 WJ 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sudbury, ON.
Posts: 688
I absolutely love my WJ as a DD. Last year I tried the car thing and got an Acura 2.3CL. It was reliable, comfortable, handled awesome, looked great, and loaded but I got tired of not being able to leave gravel roads, carry crap, and always having to stare at a bumper while stuck in traffic.

My fiance has an Accord but whenever we go anywhere together it's always in the Jeep. The Jeep gets half the fuel mileage but it's still our vehicle of choice, even on long trips.

Joe, if you've never owned a 4x4 for regular snow-driving, you'll love it and never go back.

As for reliability, I think they're great (for a domestic vehicle). No, they won't compare to a Honda, but for value you can't beat an old Grand. I found the receipt for my '99 parts Grand in the glovebox. In 1999, the guy paid $47,000 CDN out the door for it. They're really loaded, premium vehicles but depreciate fast, allowing guys like us to drive luxury machines for dirt cheap. Your parents' 2000 Grand would probably be worth about the same as a '97 CR-V. Now drive the two of them and see which one you like better. Those two vehicles were engineered to be in totally different classes.

Comparing WJ reliability to its competitors, the Dub wins hands-down (In my educated opinion and common knowledge). They're far better in every way compared to GM's Blazer/Jimmy junk and Ford's Explorer.


So I installed the flux capacitor but the Jeep just won't do 88 mph.

-'99 WJ Limited, 4.7, Patriot Blue, 2" BB, 31" Mall-Terrains, Pavement Princess
-'97 TJ, Stone White, 4" Superlift, 33" SSRs, lunchboxed rear, 12K Titan winch, and 2.5 litres of exhillirating performance.

Last edited by CanadianZed-J; 10-01-2009 at 07:17 AM. Reason: Rambling..
CanadianZed-J is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
Reliability 3.7 vs. 4.7 vs. 5.7 01amberfirewv WK Grand Cherokee & XK Commander Forum 30 08-28-2008 07:26 PM
WJ reliability m1chjeep ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 1 06-14-2008 11:54 AM
WJ reliability ?? tufmar ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 14 12-01-2006 09:24 AM
93-94 reliability? littlewaywelt ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 8 10-04-2003 05:29 PM
Reliability MrMischiefVIP ZJ Grand Cherokee Forum 4 02-11-2002 01:06 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome