Wrangler V8? - JeepForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 18 Old 03-30-2011, 03:36 PM Thread Starter
SuperRliBerty
Registered User
2008 KK Liberty 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,442
Wrangler V8?

PLEASE JEEP! BUILD THE V8 WRANGLER AND KEEP IT UNDER $40 GRAND. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE.

Hot off the tips wire: Jeep may be planning a Hemi 392-powered version of its legendary Wrangler.
00100065-0000-0000-0000-000000000000_00000065-06d9-0000-0000-000000000000_20110330161710_jeep-20.jpg



The engine could be the same Hemi found in the Dodge Challenger SRT8 392. In that car, it produces 470 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque, along with a suitably snarly, obnoxious exhaust note. No current production Wrangler is offered with a V8.
inline-4.jpg



According to our well-placed and trustworthy tipster, a special Wrangler was built for Michael Manley, Jeep's current president and CEO. It was assembled by American Expedition Vehicles (AEV) in Montana, an aftermarket Jeep firm with strong ties to the industry and long history of Wrangler Hemi conversions. AEV has constructed concept vehicles and tested other ideas for Chrysler in the past. The Wrangler is rumored to have been built for executive evaluation, meaning we may be looking at an early iteration of a future model.


2008 Sport Liberty
Cold air intake*Trush (magnaflow) turbo muffler* Hypertech power program*
Hood Prop mod. Battery Quick Release mod.
Resonator removed (sounds like a V8 on start up)
SuperRliBerty is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 18 Old 03-30-2011, 08:07 PM
Marauder_Pilot
Moderator
 
Marauder_Pilot's Avatar
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Whitehorse
Posts: 1,997
Garage
The Wrangler is not getting the 392. 0% chance. The 392 would be a terrible engine anyways, the torque curve is all wrong.

"Buying a Jeep for on-road handling is like downloading porn to savor the cinematography."
-TTAC

| ARB/Old Man Emu | Northridge 4x4 Canada | Warn | Modern Classic Enterprises | American Expeditionary Vehicles | GenRight | Poison Spyder | OR-FAB | Metalcloak | East CoastGear Supply | JKS | M.O.R.E. |

2000 Jeep Wrangler TJ Sport-OME HD Lift, ProComp bumper, 32" BFG TA K/Os
2010 Kawasaki KLR650-Stock
2006 Ford F-250-Stock
Marauder_Pilot is offline  
post #3 of 18 Old 03-30-2011, 08:14 PM
Meep97
Senior Member
 
Meep97's Avatar
2009 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cody
Posts: 725
that would be a sweet Ride!
Meep97 is offline  
post #4 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 01:03 PM Thread Starter
SuperRliBerty
Registered User
2008 KK Liberty 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meep97 View Post
that would be a sweet Ride!


It would be a ball to offroad with it wish Jeep or AEV should try to squeeze a hemi in a Liberty

2008 Sport Liberty
Cold air intake*Trush (magnaflow) turbo muffler* Hypertech power program*
Hood Prop mod. Battery Quick Release mod.
Resonator removed (sounds like a V8 on start up)
SuperRliBerty is offline  
post #5 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 01:10 PM Thread Starter
SuperRliBerty
Registered User
2008 KK Liberty 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marauder_Pilot View Post
The Wrangler is not getting the 392. 0% chance. The 392 would be a terrible engine anyways, the torque curve is all wrong.
Well AEV has done it for micheal manley. I am sure chrysler engineers can redo the intake, cams and heads to make full torque at low rpm.


ALLPAR

Michael Manley, Jeep president and CEO, apparently has had a 6.4-liter Hemi 392 V-8 engine dropped into a Jeep Wrangler by American Expedition Vehicles for "executive evaluation" of a possible future production vehicle. We like the idea, just as we did in 2007 when Jeep unveiled the Wrangler Ultimate concept.

Of course, those with even longer memories will remember the AMC days when a 5.0-liter V-8 was tucked into the CJ5 and CJ7, predecessors to the modern Wrangler. Those experiments were a bit more terrifying and a bit less awesome than we expect a Hemi-powered Wrangler to be, however. Nonetheless, there's precedent for this formula, so despite its proximity to April Fool's Day, this ia no April Fool's Day joke, there's at least the aroma of possibility here.

Should the 470-horsepower Hemi 392 find its way into a Wrangler, we can expect a range of appearance and options tweaks, though if the SEMA concept is any indicator, not much else will need to change. A slight lift, larger wheels and fat mud-worthy tires are possible upgrades, though likely as an option package. According to the drive notes from the source of the new report, however, a lower, more street-oriented (SRT8-style?) suspension may be in order: if you floor it in third, the vehicle "will go sideways."

We'll keep our eyes on this development, but for now, check out the full story at the link below.

[ALLPAR]

We are committed to offering honest, unbiased reviews. Read our Editorial Policy.

2008 Sport Liberty
Cold air intake*Trush (magnaflow) turbo muffler* Hypertech power program*
Hood Prop mod. Battery Quick Release mod.
Resonator removed (sounds like a V8 on start up)
SuperRliBerty is offline  
post #6 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 02:26 PM
AMCSportTruck
Registered User
1988 MJ Comanche 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prairie du sac
Posts: 753
That is true the CJ's had AMC-304s factory and AMC-343s & 360s swapped into them all the time.

Mike

1953 Studebaker M275 / 1962 GMC 4500 / 1969 AMC AMX-390 / 1977 Ford F350 / 1982 AM-Eagle SX/290 .

1982 AM-Jeep J-5500 / 1988 AM-Jeep MJ-343 / 1992 GTA Trans AM / 2007 Honda Rubicon.
AMCSportTruck is offline  
post #7 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 02:35 PM Thread Starter
SuperRliBerty
Registered User
2008 KK Liberty 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,442
Jeep should tuned the hemi wrangler for off roading and street rodding..... quite a feat, but it's 2011, the technology and hardware exist to do it

2008 Sport Liberty
Cold air intake*Trush (magnaflow) turbo muffler* Hypertech power program*
Hood Prop mod. Battery Quick Release mod.
Resonator removed (sounds like a V8 on start up)
SuperRliBerty is offline  
post #8 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 02:39 PM
AMCSportTruck
Registered User
1988 MJ Comanche 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prairie du sac
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marauder_Pilot View Post
The Wrangler is not getting the 392. 0% chance. The 392 would be a terrible engine anyways, the torque curve is all wrong.
Yea Ok, That is like saying the GM-350 in a Z28 is the exact same as a GM-350 in a C-60 truck.
I'm am sure IF the 6.4 was to be done as a factory option there would be 2 different engine configurations

Mike

1953 Studebaker M275 / 1962 GMC 4500 / 1969 AMC AMX-390 / 1977 Ford F350 / 1982 AM-Eagle SX/290 .

1982 AM-Jeep J-5500 / 1988 AM-Jeep MJ-343 / 1992 GTA Trans AM / 2007 Honda Rubicon.
AMCSportTruck is offline  
post #9 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 02:44 PM
carlton
Registered User
2007  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Clemson
Posts: 257
man I posted the same thread the other day and everyone flipped a s*** at me... i'm hurt i just wanted to share the article I read lol
carlton is offline  
post #10 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 02:51 PM
AMCSportTruck
Registered User
1988 MJ Comanche 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prairie du sac
Posts: 753
I have noticed that, This forum dose have "PMS" from time to time. I guess bi polar would be a more fitting explanation of it.

Its all a timing thing, plus it also depends on who posted it as well. I could a thread and YOU could post the same thread I mean 100% copy/paste job and you'll have 2 complete different reactions.

So its WHAT vs WHEN vs WHO all factor in

Mike

1953 Studebaker M275 / 1962 GMC 4500 / 1969 AMC AMX-390 / 1977 Ford F350 / 1982 AM-Eagle SX/290 .

1982 AM-Jeep J-5500 / 1988 AM-Jeep MJ-343 / 1992 GTA Trans AM / 2007 Honda Rubicon.
AMCSportTruck is offline  
post #11 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 02:55 PM Thread Starter
SuperRliBerty
Registered User
2008 KK Liberty 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMCSportTruck View Post
I have noticed that, This forum dose have "PMS" from time to time. I guess bi polar would be a more fitting explanation of it.

Its all a timing thing, plus it also depends on who posted it as well. I could a thread and YOU could post the same thread I mean 100% copy/paste job and you'll have 2 complete different reactions.

So its WHAT vs WHEN vs WHO all factor in

Mike

2008 Sport Liberty
Cold air intake*Trush (magnaflow) turbo muffler* Hypertech power program*
Hood Prop mod. Battery Quick Release mod.
Resonator removed (sounds like a V8 on start up)
SuperRliBerty is offline  
post #12 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 02:59 PM
AMCSportTruck
Registered User
1988 MJ Comanche 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prairie du sac
Posts: 753
Its true, Have 2 members here that you know post 2 identical threads then sit back watch the 2 play out. I bet the reaction's n comments and activity in both will differ greatly.

Mike

1953 Studebaker M275 / 1962 GMC 4500 / 1969 AMC AMX-390 / 1977 Ford F350 / 1982 AM-Eagle SX/290 .

1982 AM-Jeep J-5500 / 1988 AM-Jeep MJ-343 / 1992 GTA Trans AM / 2007 Honda Rubicon.
AMCSportTruck is offline  
post #13 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 03:03 PM
Dreadnaught1181
Registered User
2011 WK 
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 20
Such a vehicle would be badass but would also get Chrysler crucified by CAFE and the EPA.

I bet the mileage of the prototype is close to single digits given the Wranglers design.

Now if Chrysler were to develop a kit where a customer could swap a 392 into his/her Wrangler, thats another matter.
Dreadnaught1181 is offline  
post #14 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 06:51 PM
AMCSportTruck
Registered User
1988 MJ Comanche 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prairie du sac
Posts: 753
Yep dose single digit MPG's bother you ? ? ? Heck you won't like my rigs, Most get 6-9MPG's ! ! !
If I were to buy a Hemi Wrangler MPGs really wouldn't be of any concern to me.

Performance would be my concern It better NOT be doggy !
Mike

1953 Studebaker M275 / 1962 GMC 4500 / 1969 AMC AMX-390 / 1977 Ford F350 / 1982 AM-Eagle SX/290 .

1982 AM-Jeep J-5500 / 1988 AM-Jeep MJ-343 / 1992 GTA Trans AM / 2007 Honda Rubicon.
AMCSportTruck is offline  
post #15 of 18 Old 03-31-2011, 07:14 PM
tobias94yj
Hillbilly Member
 
tobias94yj's Avatar
1994 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sevierville, TN
Posts: 1,118
I would just be happy if they at offered the 3.6L pentastar in the 2 door JK and the 4.7L v8 in at least the 4 door JK so you can actually tow with it.

To view the NEW Jeep Encyclopedia click here!!!
tobias94yj is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
COD: Black Ops SE Wrangler USAFRecon Future Models & Prototype Discussion 6 10-19-2010 05:36 PM
Wrangler gets 2.8L diesel in Oct slow2run Future Models & Prototype Discussion 93 03-05-2010 12:39 AM
SRT6 Wrangler badoosh27 Future Models & Prototype Discussion 14 06-21-2007 05:54 PM
Wrangler based H4 Swee Future Models & Prototype Discussion 1 02-21-2007 08:15 AM
Wrangler SRT6 RCHavok797 Future Models & Prototype Discussion 11 02-17-2007 06:27 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome