Wrangler gets 2.8L diesel in Oct - Page 3 - JeepForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 94 Old 12-18-2009, 06:15 AM
bnther36
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mich
Posts: 61
CRD...fail...win...whatever. Just give me one with a pickup bed already!


I never understood why mid-sized or even small trucks are so frowned upon here in the US. I had a full sized Silverado w/extended cab. I felt like I was driving a school bus. And I would never even dream of taking that to camp Jeep. If you really want to have fun off-road, then you've got to have the right vehicle. And as far as payload is concerned, 80% of what I haul could fit in the bed of a small pickup. As for the other 20%, I've got a trailer 5' by 10' trailer. People need to get out of this rut where they can't survive without a gianormous pickup that will only get beat to hell (if not hoplessly stuck) if they try and take on the trail.

A Wrangler derived pickup w/diesel would be perfect.
"Build it...and they will buy it"

bnther36 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 94 Old 12-21-2009, 07:20 AM
click23
Registered User
2005 KJ Liberty 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 12
The CRD Liberty basically was a test bed to see if they could sale a diesel engine in a SUV. As an owner I can tell you that Jeep did not do enough homework before they started building these. The engine is great, but they dropped the ball on the emissions components, transmission and the fuel system.
click23 is offline  
post #33 of 94 Old 12-21-2009, 04:38 PM
bnther36
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mich
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by click23 View Post
The CRD Liberty basically was a test bed to see if they could sale a diesel engine in a SUV. As an owner I can tell you that Jeep did not do enough homework before they started building these. The engine is great, but they dropped the ball on the emissions components, transmission and the fuel system.
What kind of MPG do you get with the diesel?
Hwy miles vs in-town miles? I'd love to know some real world numbers.
bnther36 is offline  
post #34 of 94 Old 12-22-2009, 07:55 AM
click23
Registered User
2005 KJ Liberty 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 12
We do about 90% highway driving and normally get 22-25 mpg, but it has been 28-30 a few times just depends on how you drive the little tractor. I plan on having my computer reflashed in a month or two, some have seen a 5 mpg increase after doing theirs.
click23 is offline  
post #35 of 94 Old 12-22-2009, 04:22 PM
bnther36
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mich
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by click23 View Post
We do about 90% highway driving and normally get 22-25 mpg, but it has been 28-30 a few times just depends on how you drive the little tractor. I plan on having my computer reflashed in a month or two, some have seen a 5 mpg increase after doing theirs.
30mpg?!

That's amazing for a 4000 pound vehicle!
I might really have to look at this diesel Wrangler when it comes out. I wonder, is there any different with regards to how the engine runs if you use bio-diesel verses regular diesel? (not 'REGULAR' -- that's going back )
bnther36 is offline  
post #36 of 94 Old 12-23-2009, 08:28 AM
click23
Registered User
2005 KJ Liberty 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 12
I really have not ran bio enough to be able to tell. I can tell you in theory that your mpg should go down with bio, due to it have less BTUs that dino.

Have you ever seen the Gladiator concept? It is "A Wrangler derived pickup w/diesel". I would love if these went into production. If you have not seen it, here is some info concept-jeep-gladiator
click23 is offline  
post #37 of 94 Old 12-23-2009, 12:11 PM
bnther36
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mich
Posts: 61
GLADIATOR

I've had that as my desktop wallpaper off and on for I don't know how long. I loved the concept vehicle. Right color, right tires, right engine, loved those suicide doors...in other words, the perfect vehicle for me...and they'll never make it. (Story of my life )

Oh well, we'll see what happens now that Fiat is involved.
bnther36 is offline  
post #38 of 94 Old 12-27-2009, 11:52 PM
CoriolisSTORM
WHAT?!
 
CoriolisSTORM's Avatar
2010 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ???
Posts: 1,220
Garage
Im in the market for a jk right now, and want a diesel badly, but I suspect that it's going to get screwed up somehow. I want an Unlimited diesel with a manual. I just don't see the manual happening though. Automatic is a dealbreaker for me. Do you know how hard it is to find a decent Unlimited with a manual!?

1998 TJ Wrangler SE - Stone White, 2.5Ls of screaming lifter clacking power, AX5, 31" BFGoodrich All Terrain T/A KOs

2010 Wrangler Unlimited Sahara - Deep Water Blue, 3.8Ls of oil consuming fury, NSG-370, BFGoodrich Rugged Terrain T/A 265/70/R18s
CoriolisSTORM is offline  
post #39 of 94 Old 12-28-2009, 12:01 AM
Mark4883
Registered User
1991 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,364
Hmmm, this would be a tempting option.
Mark4883 is offline  
post #40 of 94 Old 12-28-2009, 04:52 PM
jeepwave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 68
Allpar.com - Wrangler to get revised VM diesel?

Wrangler to get revised VM diesel? | Allpar Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep News
jeepwave is offline  
post #41 of 94 Old 01-11-2010, 09:19 PM
asknight
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southwest
Posts: 2,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepwave View Post
The US market gets ****ed again.

Quote:
We have now received two credible statements that the American (and presumably Canadian) Wrangler will not be diesel-powered for the foreseeable future, and that the announcement of a diesel Wrangler in the U.S. was misinterpreted.
Take note Chrys.. Jee.., excuse me, FIAT.

I've bought two new Wranglers since 2006 and will not be throwing my money away buying another with a gas engine. The body style and the type of driving done in a Wrangler is not suited to the junk gas engines turned out by Chrysler. I don't care if it has 500hp, if I have to rev it close to 6000 rpm to use that power it is USELESS.

Jeep has totally alienated me as a customer. I'm having a terrible time talking myself out of selling these two Wranglers and investing in an ICON FJ-40. Jeep is bending over backwards to give soccer moms and college girls what they want, and not the folks who actually use a Jeep's capabilities.

Last edited by asknight; 02-04-2010 at 11:26 PM.
asknight is offline  
post #42 of 94 Old 01-24-2010, 06:23 AM
EvilM0nkey
Registered User
 
EvilM0nkey's Avatar
2002 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,784
Jeep has no choice but to bend over backwards to the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. If you don't like it.... VOTE!!! Jeep knows who it's real customers are, but the hippie liberals are forcing them to build economical cars or pay the penalty.

I'm friends with a Jeep engineer on facebook and he confirms we're getting it Just don't know when
EvilM0nkey is offline  
post #43 of 94 Old 02-04-2010, 11:27 PM
asknight
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southwest
Posts: 2,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilM0nkey View Post
Jeep has no choice but to bend over backwards to the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. If you don't like it.... VOTE!!! Jeep knows who it's real customers are, but the hippie liberals are forcing them to build economical cars or pay the penalty.

I'm friends with a Jeep engineer on facebook and he confirms we're getting it Just don't know when
How do you explain the gas guzzlers like the Viper, Charger RT/SRT8, Challenger, etc?

And a proper diesel in a JK will deliver better fuel economy than most every pickup truck, and most "sports" cars made today. I've began disbelieving everything I hear from Jeep on a JK diesel. They can only keep a rumor alive for so long before customers go elsewhere for satisfaction.

"We have no plans at the moment for diesel Jeeps in North America, although one of the things I've learned in this business is to never say never," said Michael Manley, president and chief executive officer of the Jeep brand. "I wouldn't rule it out, but specifically on Nov. 4, we were commenting on diesel in Europe."

Bull****. The diesel is already available all over Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.

Fact is, we've been mislead.
asknight is offline  
post #44 of 94 Old 02-05-2010, 10:08 AM
JeffinWesternWA
Registered User
2010 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SW WA
Posts: 948
Diesels STILL = Soot, I beleive high NOX levels, never can pass the CA emissions that also rule the NW and NE states. Plus, w/ low sales volume cuz, most Jeeps are drivers by gas users. A diesel option for $4K won't sell, in this economy, "maybe" when Wrangler gets a redo and Pentastar or whatever motors are available ('11 maybe , '12, '13 likely). A diesel w/ a standard IS a no go, the emissions of a diesle, especially at deaccel would be off teh stringent charts of tody's mandates, it's pretty simple. Now a NAT GAS powered car, in fact MNAY would make sense and be CHEAP to fuel foreveer and we'd send NO oney to countries that hate us! rant over....

JeffinWesternWA
JeffinWesternWA is offline  
post #45 of 94 Old 02-05-2010, 09:59 PM
BadAsh74
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 191
The Charger/Challenger/300C are hardly gas guzzlers. Even with a Hemi, its still the MDS system and you can get mid 20s out of them on the highway--at least in the case of the charger/300. The challenger gets less mpg probably due to more aggressive tuning and gearing. For a 300+ hp fullsize car thats f'in AMAZING.

Toyota loves to brag about how fuel effiecient they are. Its a load of B.S. Their highest mpg non hybrid car (that yaris thing) only gets 36 mpg hwy. The way I see it, a made-from-tin fwd weenie car with less than 100 hp should be getting 45-50 mpg minimum. But look at what youre driving, it looks like an electric shaver. The charger/300 are only giving up 10 mpg hwy yet they have powerful V-8s, rear wheel drive, plenty of room, theyre a solid chunk of car that wont fall apart if you hit a sparrow and (if you like sedans) at least have SOME style. So when you look at what you get for your money and youre mpg, who's really the gas guzzler? That toyota is less than half the car of any of the Hemi LX's so the tradeoff should be at least double the efficiency, but it isnt so. A 4cyl camry is only rated at 32 mpg hwy. You can get out and run faster than one of those, and yet its barely more efficient than a hemi mopar.
BadAsh74 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
Wrangler 2.8L Diesel NOT happening? ordually Future Models & Prototype Discussion 50 07-28-2010 09:23 PM
Chrysler gets 3.0 diesel slow2run Future Models & Prototype Discussion 17 12-12-2009 02:50 PM
Diesel Wrangler for Q4 2010! (Maybe) Marauder_Pilot Future Models & Prototype Discussion 11 12-11-2009 04:15 PM
DIESEL and JEEP JK REXEY Future Models & Prototype Discussion 30 04-29-2009 10:25 AM
Wrangler Unlimited Diesel aka: 50 JK BlackRubi79 Future Models & Prototype Discussion 3 02-21-2007 04:42 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome