Why not a 3.7L Diesel? - Page 3 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Future Models & Prototype Discussion > Why not a 3.7L Diesel?

Introducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed LineFS: Jeep Fog Light LED Bulbs! Several Brightness Options! Clayton Off Road JK Short Arm Suspension Kits

Reply
Unread 11-14-2011, 09:20 AM   #31
XJ2Timer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Temple, TX
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitegoat View Post
people do it every day
People. Not corporations. Crash standards. Pedestrian impact standards. Emissions. Making all of the changes to the braking system, suspension system, tuning shocks for the weight of the engine. Changing the code for the stability control and traction control and ABS due to the weight changes. Will there have to be changes to the frame? Larger radiator? How many items under the hood will have to be relocated?

These are just some of the things I can think of and I don't know squat about engineering.

__________________
1st one- 1989 Cherokee Laredo. 12 great years
2nd one- 2001 Cherokee Limited. Got it before they were gone.
XJ2Timer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-14-2011, 02:34 PM   #32
whitegoat
Member
 
whitegoat's Avatar
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: marshall, TX
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by XJ2Timer View Post
People. Not corporations. Crash standards. Pedestrian impact standards. Emissions. Making all of the changes to the braking system, suspension system, tuning shocks for the weight of the engine. Changing the code for the stability control and traction control and ABS due to the weight changes. Will there have to be changes to the frame? Larger radiator? How many items under the hood will have to be relocated?

These are just some of the things I can think of and I don't know squat about engineering.
thats why i said people, meaning aftermarket, and i understand u have to do all that, but your gonna have to do it with ANY motor swap wether it be motori, cummins, briggs & stratton, thats what i couldn't get the other guy to understand, the arguement is about WHAT diesel to put in there
__________________

13' JK, leveled, 33"s (my mall crawler)
99' XJ limited, 6" w/ 3 link, 35" procomps
04' Rubicon 4.5" long arm, 35" bfg km2's -sold
91' XJ 6.5" rough country, 34" LTB's - sold
76' CJ5 4", 36" TSL's - sold
whitegoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2011, 12:36 AM   #33
Ungerer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Glenden, Queensland
Posts: 703
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitegoat

thats why i said people, meaning aftermarket, and i understand u have to do all that, but your gonna have to do it with ANY motor swap wether it be motori, cummins, briggs & stratton, thats what i couldn't get the other guy to understand, the arguement is about WHAT diesel to put in there
The one that you have to do the least work on ? And a v8 would be the one
Ungerer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 07:30 AM   #34
whitegoat
Member
 
whitegoat's Avatar
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: marshall, TX
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ungerer View Post
The one that you have to do the least work on ? And a v8 would be the one
you make no sense at all, have you looked under the hood of a jk, they would have to design a v8 to fit (therefore more work) and i've already proved its useless dont need a v8 diesel in a jeep
__________________

13' JK, leveled, 33"s (my mall crawler)
99' XJ limited, 6" w/ 3 link, 35" procomps
04' Rubicon 4.5" long arm, 35" bfg km2's -sold
91' XJ 6.5" rough country, 34" LTB's - sold
76' CJ5 4", 36" TSL's - sold
whitegoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 01:37 PM   #35
Ungerer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Glenden, Queensland
Posts: 703
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitegoat

you make no sense at all, have you looked under the hood of a jk, they would have to design a v8 to fit (therefore more work) and i've already proved its useless dont need a v8 diesel in a jeep
The wk2 already has two v8,s Toyota has two v8,s petrol & diesel ! If they can get the 6.4L in it they can get a small v8 diesel in too
Ungerer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 02:32 PM   #36
XJ2Timer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Temple, TX
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ungerer View Post
The wk2 already has two v8,s Toyota has two v8,s petrol & diesel ! If they can get the 6.4L in it they can get a small v8 diesel in too
You can't compare different vehicles and assume a V8 would fit and pass crash standards.

Now if you want that V8 JK to be a four door with no transfer case or front axle it would probably take less work to make it fit.
__________________
1st one- 1989 Cherokee Laredo. 12 great years
2nd one- 2001 Cherokee Limited. Got it before they were gone.
XJ2Timer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 02:51 PM   #37
whitegoat
Member
 
whitegoat's Avatar
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: marshall, TX
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by XJ2Timer View Post
You can't compare different vehicles and assume a V8 would fit and pass crash standards.

Now if you want that V8 JK to be a four door with no transfer case or front axle it would probably take less work to make it fit.
^^^^^^
__________________

13' JK, leveled, 33"s (my mall crawler)
99' XJ limited, 6" w/ 3 link, 35" procomps
04' Rubicon 4.5" long arm, 35" bfg km2's -sold
91' XJ 6.5" rough country, 34" LTB's - sold
76' CJ5 4", 36" TSL's - sold
whitegoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 03:05 PM   #38
Ungerer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Glenden, Queensland
Posts: 703
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitegoat

^^^^^^
So that said your right but as said it already has the small & big v8 in it so they should be ok to put a small v8 diesel in it ? if the wk2 only had a 4 & v6,s it would be harder but it already has two v8,s so it has already been tested for v8,s . And you said it was to small it is not ! That is why I said about the toyota ute we are not talking about a small jeep we are talking about the GC
Ungerer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 06:08 PM   #39
thelazerviking
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: central NJ
Posts: 47
What's the bottom s h i t t i n line here? I want the cherokee and tj to come back and with diesel. I think they could do it. Of course, it probably wouldn't sell in the markets they want it to sell in....but i'd be so pleased
__________________
22, Living life.
thelazerviking is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 07:01 PM   #40
ryan6580
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: wanatah, in
Posts: 392
You don't need a v-8 diesel. Weight is a huge issue. There was talk of gm running a small caterpillar diesel in there HD trucks before the duramax was introduced but the frames and front suspension wasn't heavy enough. With the light weight of a jeep it would do just fine with an intercooled inline 4 turbo diesel.
ryan6580 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 08:03 PM   #41
Ungerer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Glenden, Queensland
Posts: 703
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryan6580
You don't need a v-8 diesel. Weight is a huge issue. There was talk of gm running a small caterpillar diesel in there HD trucks before the duramax was introduced but the frames and front suspension wasn't heavy enough. With the light weight of a jeep it would do just fine with an intercooled inline 4 turbo diesel.
The jeep GC already have two v8,s ,so you,s are saying that the v8,s that are in the GC are to big for them bull**** lol
Ungerer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 08:06 PM   #42
whitegoat
Member
 
whitegoat's Avatar
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: marshall, TX
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryan6580 View Post
You don't need a v-8 diesel. Weight is a huge issue. There was talk of gm running a small caterpillar diesel in there HD trucks before the duramax was introduced but the frames and front suspension wasn't heavy enough. With the light weight of a jeep it would do just fine with an intercooled inline 4 turbo diesel.
finally
__________________

13' JK, leveled, 33"s (my mall crawler)
99' XJ limited, 6" w/ 3 link, 35" procomps
04' Rubicon 4.5" long arm, 35" bfg km2's -sold
91' XJ 6.5" rough country, 34" LTB's - sold
76' CJ5 4", 36" TSL's - sold
whitegoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2011, 04:16 PM   #43
Ungerer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Glenden, Queensland
Posts: 703
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitegoat

finally
So you are saying that jeep should take the v8,s out that are in the GC lol
Ungerer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2011, 05:25 PM   #44
ryan6580
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: wanatah, in
Posts: 392
Get on you tube and see what a little 4 bt cummins does in a jeep!
ryan6580 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-18-2011, 08:40 PM   #45
whitegoat
Member
 
whitegoat's Avatar
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: marshall, TX
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ungerer View Post
So you are saying that jeep should take the v8,s out that are in the GC lol
there is a big weight and power differince in a gas v8 and a diesel v8, heres a video of a 4bt
__________________

13' JK, leveled, 33"s (my mall crawler)
99' XJ limited, 6" w/ 3 link, 35" procomps
04' Rubicon 4.5" long arm, 35" bfg km2's -sold
91' XJ 6.5" rough country, 34" LTB's - sold
76' CJ5 4", 36" TSL's - sold
whitegoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.