Return of the Wagoneer? - Page 4 - JeepForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #46 of 68 Old 01-23-2011, 07:52 AM
OCS12
Registered User
2002 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sheboygan, Wi
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by markso125 View Post
But like I said they are not intended for the European market they have to be imported(you keep skipping that part apparently)...You can get a Nissan Skyline R34 here in the US from an import company, but they were never intended for US use. For you to bring one into the country you have to add a whole bunch of crap to it so it will meet the US emmisions and Safety standards of the year it was made, so new bumpers, things like that have to be installed when you get it here.
I'm not skipping the part about being imported. I was basically ignoring it for being irrelevant. Of course they had to be imported. The coffee I'm drinking at this very moment had to be imported here. Those Jeep Commanders had to be imported. The computer I'm typing this reply on was imported. There's a pretty good chance my underwear were imported!

Unlike getting a Skyline here, most of those vehicles can be special ordered right through a normal dealership (depending on which European country we're referring to). Vehicles that are emission and safety compliant in the U.S. tend to meet most of the E.U. standards, compared to some of our stupid laws that many E.U. cars don't comply with. And of course they aren't intended to be sold there. The rest of the world seems smart enough to realize that a soccer mom doesn't actually need a thirty foot long urban assault vehicle to safely navigate their way to the grocery store. Our country's rediculous obsession with absurdly large vehicles is mind boggling.

Simple yes or no, are there better vehicles available in Europe in the same class/similar price range as the Commander? Keep in mind, we're talking about mankind's greatest automotive accomplishment here!!

OCS12 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #47 of 68 Old 01-23-2011, 10:27 AM
markso125
Registered User
1982 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Layton
Posts: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by OCS12 View Post
I'm not skipping the part about being imported. I was basically ignoring it for being irrelevant. Of course they had to be imported. The coffee I'm drinking at this very moment had to be imported here. Those Jeep Commanders had to be imported. The computer I'm typing this reply on was imported. There's a pretty good chance my underwear were imported!
Awesome Imported underwear and mankind's greatest automotive accomplishment!

This thread cant fail
markso125 is offline  
post #48 of 68 Old 01-24-2011, 03:00 AM
Carlos_I
Registered User
2007 XK Commander 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by markso125 View Post
You guys do realize he is in Switzerland and they dont have Ukons, Expeditions, Suburbans or any of that over there. While we think that the commander is really a mundane attempt at trying to compete with the Expedition or the Denali, he is looking up what those vehicles look like because he has probably only seen a handfull of them in passing in the last several years, if at all in real life. But you can get a 4 wheel drive Volkswagen golf with a 2.3l v5 engine in it.

And as a note, they dont have pickup trucks as we know them anywhere but the Americas(primarily north america) either. Most places the Ranger or the High Lux (toyota tacoma) are the biggest trucks you find.

I'm glad someone noticed. And it's not just the availability, but also where you use them. In the US all the roads are big, mostly straight line, parkinglots are designed for large SUV's, etc. So having an Expedition over there is still "normal", whereas in Europe you would be totally lost. Parking lots designed for cars like Fiat Punto, and most roads follow still the same path as they did 500 years ago = not straight. Even some Autobahns in Germany are really curvy, with unlimited speedlimit.

But, coming back to the point. Sure, e.g. Ford Expedition is huge. You can fit in there 7 people with full size luggage, great. I've done it myself. You can go shopping with it, great. You can drive from coast to coast with it, great. Anything else?

The suspension is so soft that it makes it all wobbly, the handling is horrible if you really need to be able to handle the car. Meaning, not driving a straight line at 55mph. Would you drive with it 100mph on a curvy road? I wouldn't. With a Commander you can do that.

And how about rock climbing with an Expedition, or off-roading in general in the woods? Don't see many people doing that. With a Commander, you can do both.

The 3rd row in Expedition is great, you can put adults there even for a long trip. And like said, you'll still have enough room for luggage. In the Commander the 3rd row is not the same. It's usable for adults only for short distances, but for small kids it's ok. But that's anyway how I would imagine most families use it. At least our's. We've got 2 adults, 3 kids, 3 small dogs, and the occasional mother-in-law aboard. For that it's perfect. If it was bigger, it would mean bigger outer dimensions for the car, smaller ground clearance, or maybe both. Not worth it.

Ok, the third row blocks the view from the rear window. Fine. Anyway if you have a trunk full of stuff, it's blocked. And at least our 2nd and 3rd row passengers appreciate the stadium seating, so that even kids at the back are able to see the road. Which is nice. Staring at the back of the seat in front of you for 10 hours is not that great. So, it's a trade-off. And in my opinion worth it.

I don't know about the reliability of the big-*** SUVs in the US, but at least the Commander is solid and reliable as hell. I don't know about the ones over there, but mine is built in Austria, and never had a single problem in it. Just the regular service every 20 000km is enough.

The diesel-engine is unbelievable. It has 520Nm of torque as soon as you hit the pedal, which means it's there when you need it. Perfect for overtaking and pulling heavy loads uphill. And if you engage the LOW, you'll get 1400Nm of torque. Enough to pull just about anything.

So to sum it up. There are bigger SUVs. There are more luxurious SUVs. There are more off-road capable SUVs (not many though, especially for 7 people). But I have not seen a better all-purpose vehicle. So far we've asked about everything from the Commander that you can ask from a car. Not once has the answer been "sorry, can't do it".

When going gets tough - The Commander gets going
Carlos_I is offline  
post #49 of 68 Old 01-24-2011, 11:48 AM
saxart
Registered User
1999 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 272
I'm going to take a step back for a moment.....

Has anyone else here noticed that there has been "talk" about both a Jeep truck, and a Jeep Wagoneer on this "future models" forum, but nobody knows what chassis either vehicle is going to use?

Maybe Jeep has a new chassis that it will use for BOTH!

I intend to live forever. So far, so good.

'99 Wrangler Sport: 2.5" Old Man Emo lift and shocks, adjustable trackbars, Quick-Disko sway links, rollin on 31" BFG A/Ts
saxart is offline  
post #50 of 68 Old 01-24-2011, 02:36 PM
OCS12
Registered User
2002 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sheboygan, Wi
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by saxart View Post
I'm going to take a step back for a moment.....

Has anyone else here noticed that there has been "talk" about both a Jeep truck, and a Jeep Wagoneer on this "future models" forum, but nobody knows what chassis either vehicle is going to use?

Maybe Jeep has a new chassis that it will use for BOTH!
It's already been reported that the Wagoneer will go on a stretched Grand Cherokee platform. I think they've also mentioned that the truck will go on the Unlimited JK's platform.
OCS12 is offline  
post #51 of 68 Old 01-25-2011, 01:59 PM
Marauder_Pilot
Moderator
 
Marauder_Pilot's Avatar
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Whitehorse
Posts: 2,001
Garage
Direct from the Detroit Auto Show, the Grand Wagoneer is destined for the Durango platform with uprated suspension (Or a stretched Grand Cherokee, whichever way you want to look at it), and the Gladiator will be built on a stretched Wrangler Unlimited platform.

"Buying a Jeep for on-road handling is like downloading porn to savor the cinematography."
-TTAC

| ARB/Old Man Emu | Northridge 4x4 Canada | Warn | Modern Classic Enterprises | American Expeditionary Vehicles | GenRight | Poison Spyder | OR-FAB | Metalcloak | East CoastGear Supply | JKS | M.O.R.E. |

2000 Jeep Wrangler TJ Sport-OME HD Lift, ProComp bumper, 32" BFG TA K/Os
2010 Kawasaki KLR650-Stock
2006 Ford F-250-Stock
Marauder_Pilot is online now  
post #52 of 68 Old 01-27-2011, 10:30 AM
RockRodHooligan
Web Wheeler
 
RockRodHooligan's Avatar
1996 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Noblesville
Posts: 5,452
Found on the interwebz. Nothing official, but not a bad look........ aside from the wheels.
Attached Thumbnails
2011.jpg   matt_murphy_design_car_future_jeep_wagoneer_grand.jpg  
RockRodHooligan is offline  
post #53 of 68 Old 01-27-2011, 01:37 PM
XJ2Timer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Temple, TX
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockRodHooligan View Post
Found on the interwebz. Nothing official, but not a bad look........ aside from the wheels.
That looks pretty good.

1st one- 1989 Cherokee Laredo. 12 great years
2nd one- 2001 Cherokee Limited. Got it before they were gone.
XJ2Timer is offline  
post #54 of 68 Old 01-27-2011, 06:57 PM Thread Starter
Bionicrooster
Registered User
2010 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Atco - NJ
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by OCS12 View Post
It's already been reported that the Wagoneer will go on a stretched Grand Cherokee platform. I think they've also mentioned that the truck will go on the Unlimited JK's platform.
Yep

" We do not inherit our wildlife from our fathers, we only borrow it from our children."
Bionicrooster is offline  
post #55 of 68 Old 01-27-2011, 07:42 PM
kenskis
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by XJ2Timer View Post
That looks pretty good.
Agreed, that actually looks really good. The front and rear doors look a little out of proportion, but other then that, I'd be happy if that was the production model. It keeps all of the key elements of the original design.

|______
|l ,[____],
l---L –OlllllllO-
()_)-()_)--o-)_)
Red 03 TJ sport l OME lift l ARB's front & rear l 4.11 gears l 32X11.50" MTR's l Nth Degree Tummy Tucker l SYE & CV l Nth Degree Dana 44 slider l Nth Degree Oil Pan Skid l JKS adjustable front track bar l KC slimlights l Rock Rails l IPF H4 headlights l Dynamat
kenskis is offline  
post #56 of 68 Old 01-29-2011, 03:09 AM
Jcool
Registered User
1993 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 343
i want it to look like this




note: ripped from another topic in this forum

_=====o000o
//__l_l_,\____\,____
l_--\_l__l_/--|lllll|
_.(o)_)__.(o)_)--o-)_) 1993 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4.0L
Jcool is offline  
post #57 of 68 Old 01-29-2011, 02:36 PM
solidsnake1761
Registered User
2000 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: parsippany
Posts: 152
i would buy that in a heart beat
solidsnake1761 is offline  
post #58 of 68 Old 01-29-2011, 06:21 PM
markso125
Registered User
1982 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Layton
Posts: 233
I think the headlights are Hideous on that thing.
markso125 is offline  
post #59 of 68 Old 01-29-2011, 10:44 PM
Jcool
Registered User
1993 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by markso125 View Post
I think the headlights are Hideous on that thing.
its a shopped Commander so yeah i agree

_=====o000o
//__l_l_,\____\,____
l_--\_l__l_/--|lllll|
_.(o)_)__.(o)_)--o-)_) 1993 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4.0L
Jcool is offline  
post #60 of 68 Old 02-06-2011, 11:35 AM
bluefever
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 99
just what we need another dead *** copy and the spiritual successor for the pos commander

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bionicrooster View Post
bluefever is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
Return of the CJ3B! kenskis Future Models & Prototype Discussion 17 07-01-2010 09:58 AM
Return of the Islander GasAxe Future Models & Prototype Discussion 13 06-28-2010 10:42 AM
new grand wagoneer? jos88gw Future Models & Prototype Discussion 45 10-29-2009 07:06 AM
Jeep Wagoneer Sketch H3RTCH Future Models & Prototype Discussion 0 03-22-2009 10:43 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome