Jeep Truck Gladiator v. NuKiser - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Future Models & Prototype Discussion > Jeep Truck Gladiator v. NuKiser

End of Summer Sale, 20% OFF!2007 - 2011 Jeep JK Long Arm Lift KitsIntroducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed Line

View Poll Results: Jeep Truck Gladiator v. NuKiser
Gladiator 20 42.55%
NuKiser 27 57.45%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Unread 09-27-2010, 07:24 PM   #1
bradf814
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Moreno Valley, California
Posts: 322
Jeep Truck Gladiator v. NuKiser

Reading all the "New Jeep Truck" threads has enlightened me on a topic for my compare and contrast essay.
Now lets assume, Both of the prototype Jeep trucks were coming to market. Each having its own ups and downs. Neither one is going to be a perfect offroad light truck from the dealer, so lets give some predicted specs on both.

Both will be built on a JK UNLIMITED frame.
All stock specifications that are missing will be filled in with 2010 stock JK Unlimited specs.
(im not sure on the specifics of all JK's so feel free to fill in what im missing and i will change it.)

GLADIATOR:




Engine: 3.6 Pentastar V6
Transmission: 6spd manual OR auto
Transfer case:
Axles: Dana 44 Rear, Dana 30 Front
Suspension: Leaf Springs in rear, Coils in front
Tires/Wheels: LT265/75R16




NUKISER:





Engine: 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 6spd manual OR auto
Transfer Case:
Axles: Dana 60 Rear, Dana 44 Front
Suspension: Leaf springs in rear, Coils in front
Tires/Wheels: LT265/75R16


These trucks will NOT be the super duper cool concept cars that were released in Moab, i.e. 38" krawlers for the NuKiser and 35" krawlers on the Gladiator.
you'll have to use your imagination, but imagine a stock truck that you can buy directly off of the dealers lot.
with these specs given, which would you rather buy jeepforum?
discuss.
Special Incentive!!: 2.8L 4 Cylinder VM Diesel engine is an option for BOTH.


Edit: these specifications have been made up by myself and in NO WAY are official specs for either truck.

__________________
^probably sarcasm.
Zombie Hunters #13
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJandMe View Post
Ride topless, wave, and be F-ing happy! (write that down)
bradf814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-27-2010, 08:04 PM   #2
madZJ
Registered User
2002 WJ 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The last frontier
Posts: 309
Nukiser hands down.
madZJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-27-2010, 08:07 PM   #3
clerical12
Registered User
1997 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Beale AFB, NorCal
Posts: 74
yeah, NuKiser
clerical12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-27-2010, 08:16 PM   #4
AMCSportTruck
Registered User
1988 MJ Comanche 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prairie du sac, Wisconsin
Posts: 753
Gladiator, its more believable as truck . . . The Nuk-715 looks more like a HotRod then a work horse !

Mike
AMCSportTruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-27-2010, 10:25 PM   #5
bradf814
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Moreno Valley, California
Posts: 322
Giving this thread a bump

which would you prefer? please give reasons.

thanks
__________________
^probably sarcasm.
Zombie Hunters #13
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJandMe View Post
Ride topless, wave, and be F-ing happy! (write that down)
bradf814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-28-2010, 03:39 AM   #6
Jcool
Registered User
1993 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 342
gladiator, as it would be more appealing to the general public therefore sell better. Also would be more likely to be produced for a long time. The Nukizer would be too nich to be practical
__________________
_=====o000o
//__l_l_,\____\,____
l_--\_l__l_/--|lllll|
_.(o)_)__.(o)_)--o-)_) 1993 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4.0L
Jcool is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-28-2010, 08:18 AM   #7
Kevos97TJ
Registered User
1997 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Montclair, New Jersey
Posts: 167
I would choose the one that came with a manual trans and was able to tow my TJ to the trail
__________________
"when in doubt... throttle out!"

[URL="http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f9/tj-tech-boot-camp-must-read-new-tj-owners-forum-members-722109/"]TJ BOOT CAMP: GREAT INFO![/URL]

1997 TJ, Citron Pearlcoat, AX-15, 4.0, D30/D35 open, 4.56s, 33 inch BFG T/A KOs on AEVs
2012 Patriot Sport 4X4 5speed - the new DD
my blog - [URL="www.kevinspocket.com"]www.kevinspocket.com[/URL]
Kevos97TJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-28-2010, 09:11 AM   #8
dayriesw
Web Wheeler
 
dayriesw's Avatar
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 5,165
Gladiator (DD) for the king cab practicallity and the look.
__________________
Impact Orange LJ - DD...sitting low, flat bottomed, fully armored and locked on 37s
dayriesw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-28-2010, 01:03 PM   #9
slow2run
Registered User
1993 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: lufkin tx
Posts: 313
What type of seats ? maybe 80/20 or what. What do you want ?
slow2run is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-28-2010, 01:07 PM   #10
pmccoy9876
Registered User
1997 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
Posts: 938
Nukaiser, based solely on the fact that it looks cool and is like a J8 with classic styling!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrNate View Post
Are you insane? Do you have any idea how many slip-and-fall accidents are caused by carelessly discarded banana peels? This is a crime of Vaudevillian proportions and must not be tolerated in a civilized society.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanCJ2A View Post
I have no input of any value to this thread but those are awesome.
'No Solution' Build Thread
pmccoy9876 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-28-2010, 01:10 PM   #11
MurdaJs
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Woods
Posts: 1,953
I would rather buy the NuKiser, but thats just me
__________________
Built one piece at a time, and it cost me many dimes
MurdaJs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-28-2010, 01:16 PM   #12
USAFRecon
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 1,407
Love the Nuke

But something along the lines of the Gladiator is probably gonna happen in 2012.
USAFRecon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-28-2010, 03:11 PM   #13
Jbostick
Registered User
2006 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Posts: 100
I think there both sweet! I would buy either, I think the Gladiator would be more practical as a DD
Jbostick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-28-2010, 09:44 PM   #14
kenskis
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 287
Gladiator, a pickup needs the cab extension for gear, or small people / pets. A strict two seater is far less practical.
__________________
|______
|l ,[____],
l---L –OlllllllO-
()_)-()_)--o-)_)
Red 03 TJ sport l OME lift l ARB's front & rear l 4.11 gears l 32X11.50" MTR's l Nth Degree Tummy Tucker l SYE & CV l Nth Degree Dana 44 slider l Nth Degree Oil Pan Skid l JKS adjustable front track bar l KC slimlights l Rock Rails l IPF H4 headlights l Dynamat
kenskis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-29-2010, 05:25 PM   #15
TheSurvivalist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 23
Gladiator!!!
TheSurvivalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.