God Bless You 5$/Gal Gasoline - Page 2 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Future Models & Prototype Discussion > God Bless You 5$/Gal Gasoline

Rough Country Lift Kits and Parts!Yukon Hardcore Locking hubs Dana 44!! CCOR 706-207-4140Truc-Lite LED Headlights! OCONEE OFF-ROAD 706-534-9955

Reply
Unread 03-07-2011, 08:11 PM   #16
rosco1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: left coast
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pathkiller View Post
Based on what? No factory diesel Jeep has ever been rated higher than 25mpg. What makes you think they'll suddenly take an enormous leap up to 35mpg? A Wrangler is shaped like a brick, not exactly conducive to high mpg.
what factory jeep? the liberty;way more of a brick than a wrongler. the diesel cherokees of the eighties using older than dirt tech? why wouldnt it? stock, i can see it happening.

vw rates it jetta as 42mpg. people are reporting 55mpgs+ with conservative driving. hell theres a guy on a diesel site getting 30+ with an isuzu box truck motor in a late sixties f-100, so i dont see 35mpg's out of a stock wrangler oilburner a problem. maybe not epa rated, but definitely doable

__________________
old sig removed, 'cause someone got butthurt
rosco1 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-07-2011, 08:28 PM   #17
srmitchell
Registered User
2001 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Humboldt County, CA, California
Posts: 3,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pathkiller View Post
Based on what? No factory diesel Jeep has ever been rated higher than 25mpg. What makes you think they'll suddenly take an enormous leap up to 35mpg? A Wrangler is shaped like a brick, not exactly conducive to high mpg.
Not true. Our overseas friends say the diesel xj gets low 30's, and it'd be easy to see, they're so light.

The car industry is seriously flawed.

All this new technology is making cars much bigger, bulkier, and HEAVY.

No wonder the liberty vs the xj is like a 800 pound difference. We need lighter vehicles built to last, with small diesels.

I would kill to have a vw diesel in my xj. Best of both worlds.
__________________
2001 XJ, patriot blue, 4 inch RE lift, IRO long arms, 33's. Caged, locked, armored -Trail Rig
2004 WJ Special Edition, Silver, 3 inch IRO lift, 4.7, JK graphite moab wheels/SRA's- Mom's dd
2004 WJ Overland, Onyx Green, 90% dechromed, soon to have JK moab's, BFG MT's, and a 3 inch IRO lift My new DD/ project
srmitchell is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-07-2011, 09:11 PM   #18
BadAsh74
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pathkiller View Post
Based on what? No factory diesel Jeep has ever been rated higher than 25mpg. What makes you think they'll suddenly take an enormous leap up to 35mpg? A Wrangler is shaped like a brick, not exactly conducive to high mpg.
Aerodynamics are a factor, but then so is the fact that they keep putting underpowered engines in them such as 4 and 6 cyls that struggle to maintain freeway speeds. You put an efficient turbodiesel or a V-8 of around 5 liters in it and you'll shove that brick right thru a headwind with little penalty, possibly an increase in mpg and have power to spare. The flex fuel 4.7 would be just about right for the Wrangler. Why get 20 mpg with a wheezing minivan V-6 that has no power when you can get 20 mpg with a V-8 that can haul ***, and sound badass with a pair of flowmasters on it. Or get near 30 mpg with a 4cyl oil burner and have the torque to pull a building down.
BadAsh74 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-08-2011, 10:16 AM   #19
Tom88
Registered User
1994 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Beavercreek, Oregon
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pathkiller View Post
Based on what? No factory diesel Jeep has ever been rated higher than 25mpg. What makes you think they'll suddenly take an enormous leap up to 35mpg? A Wrangler is shaped like a brick, not exactly conducive to high mpg.

Those diesel are made for torque and power not great fuel economy. If you want 35mpg, get a Volkswagen TDI Clean Diesel or something.
Tom88 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-08-2011, 10:49 AM   #20
rosco1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: left coast
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom88 View Post
Those diesel are made for torque and power not great fuel economy. If you want 35mpg, get a Volkswagen TDI Clean Diesel or something.
what? that doesnt make any sense
__________________
old sig removed, 'cause someone got butthurt
rosco1 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-08-2011, 10:58 AM   #21
austinaubinoe
Registered User
2000 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,160
if a diesel JK wrangler comes to the US, think MOPAR will sell crate motors/ 6spd's? Im sure someone will come out with the motor mounts. I would love to swap out the 2.5L in my 2000 TJ for a factory diesel.
austinaubinoe is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-08-2011, 11:06 AM   #22
rosco1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: left coast
Posts: 108
junkyard
__________________
old sig removed, 'cause someone got butthurt
rosco1 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-08-2011, 02:31 PM   #23
Moto4x4
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 1,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by epeck87 View Post
i have accepted that my 4.0 is a gass guzzler. if your looking for good gas mileage then go buy a toyota. you dont buy a jeep for the gas mpg... you buy a jeep to go rock crawlin (i dont like the new jeeps so much)
Ya exactly. And that I6 has been in the wrangler for decades (im pretty sure) so basically your running an engine from the 60s and engines have obviously come a long way since then. Kinda makes me wonder why it took them so long to put a different engine in
Moto4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-08-2011, 04:07 PM   #24
Pathkiller
Registered User
1974 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lorton, VA
Posts: 2,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosco1 View Post
what factory jeep? the liberty;way more of a brick than a wrongler. the diesel cherokees of the eighties using older than dirt tech? why wouldnt it? stock, i can see it happening.
Liberty 2.8 CRD rated at 19 city 24 hwy. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm

Grand Cherokee 3.0 CRD rated at 17 city 22 hwy http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm

I'm afraid 35mpg is a naive pipedream.
__________________
74 CJ5 complete frame off restoration
Pathkiller is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-08-2011, 08:23 PM   #25
rosco1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: left coast
Posts: 108
says you
__________________
old sig removed, 'cause someone got butthurt
rosco1 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 04-25-2011, 10:54 PM   #26
mukluk
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Clyde, Texas
Posts: 1,466
Here are some interesting specs on the diesel Wrangler available in the UK:
http://www.jeep.co.uk/wrangler/specs/performance

2dr Sport - 28/36 for city/hwy or 33mpg combined
2dr Sahara - 24/33 for city/hwy or 29mpg combined
__________________
2000 TJ SE - Rusty's 3" susp w/OME shocks, Stock CAs&TBs, 4.88, F&R Truetracs, 33x10.5 BFG KM2, Bestop tire carrier, MM10500 hydro
2005 LJ Rubicon - RC 4" X-Series w/Bilstein 5100, Stock TBs, 4.10, 33x10.5 BFG AT, Bestop tire carrier, Warn M8000, 1350 series drive shaft, ZJ HD tie rod
mukluk is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 04-25-2011, 11:04 PM   #27
Hussler
Registered User
1992 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: utica, new york
Posts: 5,287
Look for a MAJOR redesign in the wrangler in the next few years, you like the Hyundai Santa Fe? Wait till you see the wrangler
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris87xj View Post
Sometimes a restoration project is a labor of love, at which point cost, time, and labor involved become irrelevant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BorderC View Post
I see you also twizzled your scart lead. Well done! :thumbsup:
92 XJ with ARB's, 5" lift, too much armor, 33's and some other garbage
Hussler is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 04-26-2011, 06:10 AM   #28
AMCSportTruck
Registered User
1988 MJ Comanche 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prairie du sac, Wisconsin
Posts: 753
Yep little diesels are nice, Had a Chevette with a diesel averaged 45mpg. It also maxed put at 67mph and took its sweet time to get there.

I'd hate to see the Wrangler destroyed in the pursuit of fuel mileage
Mike
__________________
1953 Studebaker M275 / 1962 GMC 4500 / 1969 AMC AMX-390 / 1977 Ford F350 / 1982 AM-Eagle SX/290 .

1982 AM-Jeep J-5500 / 1988 AM-Jeep MJ-343 / 1992 GTA Trans AM / 2007 Honda Rubicon.
AMCSportTruck is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 04-26-2011, 06:19 AM   #29
mudboy
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hammonton NJ
Posts: 693
For all I care they can put a big block in them that gets 4 mpg. I'm rocking my yukon everyday $283 in gas this weekend at 11 mpg. Go ahead and raise to $5 a gallon I'll still drive it just to make the greenies get upset. However I do plan on picking up an old jetta Diesel this weekend. 55 mpg. But I'll crank the injection up just to piss the greenies off still.
mudboy is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 04-26-2011, 06:32 AM   #30
AMCSportTruck
Registered User
1988 MJ Comanche 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prairie du sac, Wisconsin
Posts: 753
I hear ya, Everything I have get's 6-9Mpg's most of which burn 93-Oct a few guzzle 110-Oct
Fuel too . . . Except the MJ it floats between 14-16mpg's

The MJ is the first Econo truck I have had that actually has lasted me most live a few months n get crushed this thing is about to enter its third year of service

Mike
__________________
1953 Studebaker M275 / 1962 GMC 4500 / 1969 AMC AMX-390 / 1977 Ford F350 / 1982 AM-Eagle SX/290 .

1982 AM-Jeep J-5500 / 1988 AM-Jeep MJ-343 / 1992 GTA Trans AM / 2007 Honda Rubicon.
AMCSportTruck is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools






Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.