Combined 2014 Cherokee Thread - Page 7 - JeepForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #91 of 592 Old 02-22-2013, 11:25 PM
DunmerBoy
Registered User
1998 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tucson
Posts: 4,233
I actually really like it. Will it be the new XJ? probably not but as long as companies like Rusty's make lifts for it and maybe a steel replacement for that bottom piece out front and the right kind of armor for it, The new 3.2 pentastar will likely provide all the power you could need to take it out and do whatever. The new Grand Cherokee is plenty capable and this will likely follow suite. We wont know for sure until next month when we get specs from the New York Auto Show, but I see a lot of promise.


“The mountains are calling and I must go.” ― John Muir
COTM October 2014
-
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-
DunmerBoy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #92 of 592 Old 02-22-2013, 11:30 PM
DunmerBoy
Registered User
1998 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tucson
Posts: 4,233
all i hope is that its not called the WKmini....

“The mountains are calling and I must go.” ― John Muir
COTM October 2014
-
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-
DunmerBoy is offline  
post #93 of 592 Old 02-22-2013, 11:31 PM
dmill89
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Harrisburg
Posts: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Necros View Post
Wasn't there some kinda rumor about them redoing the wrangler soon and making it a little rounder? Could this be the shape of things to come?

/panic
/facepalm
While I wouldn't necessarily put it past Chrysler/FIAT to do something that stupid, I can't see a rounded off Wrangler selling well and if they drop solid axles forget it.

They may be able to get away with it on a "Cherokee"/Liberty Replacement that is aimed at the mass market that buys the utterly boring RAV4s, CRVs, etc and don't necessarily buy for off-road capability. But the Wrangler is marketed directly at enthusiasts who won't react lightly to it being "watered down".
dmill89 is offline  
post #94 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 06:49 AM
Emoto
Registered User
2002 KJ Liberty 
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmill89 View Post
While I wouldn't necessarily put it past Chrysler/FIAT to do something that stupid, I can't see a rounded off Wrangler selling well and if they drop solid axles forget it.

They may be able to get away with it on a "Cherokee"/Liberty Replacement that is aimed at the mass market that buys the utterly boring RAV4s, CRVs, etc and don't necessarily buy for off-road capability. But the Wrangler is marketed directly at enthusiasts who won't react lightly to it being "watered down".
Let's just hope they did a nice job on it in terms of interior appointments, suspension, NVH, and drivetrain. If someone looking at the Rav4 or CRV can take a test drive and not find it wanting, that would be good.

Awaiting specs, but didn't some Jeep official say a while back that new models would have a trail rated version that would have best in class ability? Not that this would be Wrangler-level capability, but if it spanks a Rav4 or CRV, that would be good. Even with the controversial styling I would rather have one of these in my garage than a Toyota or Honda.

Saving up for a Wrangler...
Emoto is offline  
post #95 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 07:23 AM
Emoto
Registered User
2002 KJ Liberty 
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 161
Oh, and here is the press release from Jeep that came with the good photos:

"Auburn Hills, Mich. - Jeep(r) Cherokee. The name is instantly recognizable as the most capable and versatile mid-size SUV in the world. For 2014, Jeep brings the Cherokee name back to North America with the debut of its all-new mid-size sport-utility vehicle.

Set to debut at the New York International Auto Show in March, the all-new, "no-compromise" 2014 Jeep Cherokee sets a new standard with even more best-in-class capability, exemplary on-road driving dynamics, and fuel economy improvements of more than 45 percent versus the outgoing mid-size SUV model.

The all-new 2014 Jeep Cherokee will be built in the United States at Chrysler Group's Toledo Assembly Plant in Toledo, Ohio, and will arrive in dealer showrooms in the third quarter of this year."


That middle paragraph is rather intriguing, I'd say. The 2012 Liberty (if that is the outgoing model they refer to) got 22 mpg highway. If that is what they are replacing then +45% = 31 mpg, which doesn't suck. It equals the CRV and exceeds the 28 mpg of the Rav4. As for "exemplary on-road driving dynamics" are we still thinking this is based on the same platform as the new Dart? A very critical automotive writer I know has nothing but good things to say about how the Dart drives. How much that has changed along the way to adding 4WD?/AWD? (since we don't know what system it will use) and adding ground clearance, we shall see. Also, "even more best-in-class capability" is certainly Marketing-speak, but could be based on something. Let's hope so. I would much rather have the CRV/Rav4 shopper buying a Jeep.

Saving up for a Wrangler...
Emoto is offline  
post #96 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 08:57 AM
grogie
M-F: Cell Block #4533
 
grogie's Avatar
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 8,059
What's up with the headlights? Today's Jeep keeps going away from the classic, round headlights, which I think is a mistake. I hate the headlights on this and the 2014 WK2. Yuck. It's like Fiat has screwed with it.


Red Jeep Club #345
2006 TJ Sport -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

2004 KJ Limited
2013 Off-Road Trailer -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Civilization is what old men manage to salvage from the onslaught of young idealists.” -- Don Colacho
grogie is online now  
post #97 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 09:24 AM
jgc98
Registered User
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 70
Like many new cars I don't like the look of, I'm sure it'll grow on me, and I might end up buying one (used) one day. But I'm puzzled what makes them go so far on design on a Jeep? Let's face it, the average buyer is pretty conservative. And this is the one that Chrysler can't afford to get wrong. So the Design Manager that convinced Management to go this way, must be a persuasive guy...

Jeeps: 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 5.2, 1989 Jeep Cherokee Limited 4.0
Other: 1978 DeTomaso Longchamp, 1972 DeTomaso Pantera, 1968 Chevrolet Camaro SS
Author of Tuning Made Easy, available at amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/Tuning-Made-Easy-Michael-Hass/dp/8771144625
jgc98 is offline  
post #98 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 09:38 AM
DunmerBoy
Registered User
1998 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tucson
Posts: 4,233
I also noticed it looks like it has the trapezoid wheel wheels not the hard U shaped ones which if I'm not mistaken, make it easier to fit more tire on less lift

“The mountains are calling and I must go.” ― John Muir
COTM October 2014
-
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-
DunmerBoy is offline  
post #99 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 09:41 AM
Chris S
Registered User
2012 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 39
It's not my taste (at least not based on the pictures, I'd like to see it in person) but I'll give them props for trying something new.

2012 JKU Black
1997 TJ Black
1983(?) CJ-8 (Dad's)
Chris S is offline  
post #100 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 10:14 AM
gunshw301
Registered User
1994 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,384
After showing her pictures, my mom is interested. She has a Hyundai Tucson and it looks similar to the new Cherokee.

F/S Dana 35, 4:10, open make an offer, local pick up only, will not ship. 3-8-13


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
gunshw301 is offline  
post #101 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 10:38 AM
jeremy04949
Registered User
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 182
Looks like a turd.
jeremy04949 is offline  
post #102 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 11:23 AM
xjken99
Registered User
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 382
The only Jeep that I have really liked since they replaced the XJ has been the Wrangler. We live in a time where ugly vehicles sell and because of that there are more ugly designs on the roads today than in any previous era. To me the new Cherokee (THAT WAS HARD TO TYPE) is pretty ugly, Juke, Cube, Xb or Aztec ugly? No. I do think it will sell better than the Liberty it replaces. I would really like to see some of the other designs that were rejected in favor of the final look just to see what else was considered. As usual I will wait to see one in person and see some specs but, I am not optimistic my initial reaction will change. My 13 year old XJ still looks and runs like new and if the time ever comes to make a choice between a new replacement or a total restoration my money is with the restoration.

Just a slightly modded XJ with a little lift, some armor, four mud tires and a few decals, so far.
xjken99 is offline  
post #103 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 11:34 AM
BamaJeepman21
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Tuscaloosa
Posts: 4,210
One of the ugliest cars I've ever seen.

-Jack
BamaJeepman21 is offline  
post #104 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 11:42 AM
Agony Wagon
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,830
Looks like a Ford.

"He will try and come up with some fancy jargon to make your comment seem insignificant."
Agony Wagon is offline  
post #105 of 592 Old 02-23-2013, 12:21 PM
Rob K
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River Falls
Posts: 1,570
Maybe the trail rated version will come with a little bigger wheels and more ground clearance. Trying to remain optomistic.
Rob K is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome