Combined 2014 Cherokee Thread - Page 40 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Future Models & Prototype Discussion > Combined 2014 Cherokee Thread

Introducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed LineRubicon Express Suspensions from CCOR 706-207-4140Smittybilt Hard Tops @ Oconee Off-Road! 706-534-9955

Reply
Unread 10-17-2013, 02:51 PM   #586
dmill89
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeepsman View Post
Doubt there is enough demand to warrant the time, effort, and money to produce a "gas guzzling deathtrap". Companies aren't trying to play those risky games to please the very few diehard loyal customers they have. They are trying to appeal to the masses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by starscream
The market already has. CAFE standards didn't kill the Hummer, $4 per gallon gas did. No one is looking to repeat that failure.
Obviously the "gas guzzling deathtrap" was an extreme example to make a point and such a vehicle probably wouldn't sell that well (it might if it were cheap enough though). That being said the point is that the market and car buyers should decide what gets built not the Government.

How many people actually care how many MPG (within reason) their vehicle gets enough that they would pay significantly more, or sacrifice reliability, performance, practicality, or utility to get a few extra MPG?

How many people would actually pay thousands more for a slightly safer vehicle (do vehicles really need 10 airbags?)?

dmill89 is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-17-2013, 05:13 PM   #587
barnettd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: fort myers, florida
Posts: 129
Here is my business model for keeping a Jeep Wrangler type vehicle alive (boxy, solid axle, tinker-able) in the face of the Gov-ment regulators...

Dissolve Jeep as a separate brand and move all the models under Dodge. If you go into Dodge and ask for a Jeep... they will point at a JK Wrangler and say "let me show you that last true hard core 4x4 on the planet".
barnettd is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-17-2013, 05:31 PM   #588
rebelbowtie
Registered User
2000 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Daphne, AL
Posts: 2,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnettd
Here is my business model for keeping a Jeep Wrangler type vehicle alive (boxy, solid axle, tinker-able) in the face of the Gov-ment regulators...

Dissolve Jeep as a separate brand and move all the models under Dodge. If you go into Dodge and ask for a Jeep... they will point at a JK Wrangler and say "let me show you that last true hard core 4x4 on the planet".
Not going to work, Dodge is all passenger cars now. That is why Ram is its own brand.
__________________
He's an angel dressed in oilskins; he's a saint in the "Sou'wester,"
He's a pluck as they come, or ever can;
He's a hero born and bred, but it hasn't swelled his head,
For he's just the U.S. Government's hired man.
rebelbowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-17-2013, 06:18 PM   #589
dmill89
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 761
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnettd View Post
Dissolve Jeep as a separate brand and move all the models under Dodge. If you go into Dodge and ask for a Jeep... they will point at a JK Wrangler and say "let me show you that last true hard core 4x4 on the planet".
It wouldn't make a difference as far as regulations go. CAFE stands for "Corporate Average Fuel Economy" i.e. average fuel economy of all Chrysler Group LLC vehicles, not for a specific brand. Unfortunately for Chrysler most of its best selling models are also its least fuel efficient (Rams, Grand Cherokees, Wranglers, 300s/Chargers).
dmill89 is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-17-2013, 10:24 PM   #590
macklamar
Registered User
1996 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Hanover, Pa
Posts: 228
Here's the thing with "the people choosing what gets built", they obviously do. But main stream manufacturers build what the majority of people will buy. They can't afford to do otherwise.

There are independent production companies that build cars for people. Check out the Hauk line of vehicles, specifically the 'rock raider' or the 'river raider'. If you want it enough, you can buy anything. But it doesn't pay to mass produce these vehicles, which is why you don't see them on show room floors.
macklamar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-18-2013, 09:22 AM   #591
starscream
Registered User
1981 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmill89 View Post
Obviously the "gas guzzling deathtrap" was an extreme example to make a point and such a vehicle probably wouldn't sell that well (it might if it were cheap enough though). That being said the point is that the market and car buyers should decide what gets built not the Government.

How many people actually care how many MPG (within reason) their vehicle gets enough that they would pay significantly more, or sacrifice reliability, performance, practicality, or utility to get a few extra MPG?

How many people would actually pay thousands more for a slightly safer vehicle (do vehicles really need 10 airbags?)?
LOL, MPG and safety were the top two considerations I used when buying our family car. It's a 2012 Grand Cherokee. The 5 star crash rating was probably the biggest factor (we have a toddler), and we went with the Pentastar over the Hemi for MPG.

But for the masses, there are surveys that ask buyers exactly what matters to them most. Take this NADA survey for example:

http://www.nadaguides.com/MediaRoom/...--truck-buyers

The #1 most important thing to buyers of both passenger cars and SUVs/trucks is fuel economy. For cars, safety is tied at #3. For SUVs/trucks, safety is also the #3 most important thing.

The answers to both your questions are probably a lot more than you think there are.
starscream is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-23-2013, 11:09 AM   #592
jay-h
Registered User
1989 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: , NJ
Posts: 4,405
FWIW Allpar weighs in "Cherokee is not Dart "

http://www.allpar.com/news/index.php...rokee-not-dart
__________________
My toys
'89 Wrangler YJ
'47 CJ2-A

wife's toys
97 Grand Cherokee (ZJ)
87 MB 560SL roadster
jay-h is offline   Reply With Quote




Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.