2011 wrangler is susposed to have alot of new changes? - Page 7 - JeepForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #91 of 101 Old 10-20-2010, 09:42 AM
XJ2Timer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Temple, TX
Posts: 805
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfgangGullich View Post
God...when will people stop knocking the 3.8? It has 12 more hp that the 4.0 and 12 more lbft of torque...and it runs decent, it's reliable, and gets ok mileage. Granted it's motivating more weight around and thus not as fast but the engine seems to do the job just fine in both my JKs. K, I've gone off topics enough for the day
Jeep did what it could with what was available. The 4.0 inline 6 couldn't meet emissions anymore. Newer crash standards also make longer inline engines difficult to use. The bottom end of the 3.8 was beefed up the year before it appeared in the JK. For the JK oil capacity went from 5 to 6 quarts. The 3.8 push rod V6 makes its torque at a lower rpm than the 3.7 overhead cam V6 in the Liberty. The 4.0 V6 in the Nitro wouldn't be a good choice for low speed off roading either.

Just like us XJ owners complained when the 3.7 showed up in the KJ Liberty instead of the 4.0 in line 6.

The only way to honestly compare the engines would be to stuff a 3.7 in a Cherokee and a 4.0 in a Liberty and see how they do. Likewise you would have to stuff a 3.8 in a TJ and a 4.0 in a JK. The KJ Liberty weighs a lot more than an XJ just like a JK weighs lots more than a TJ.

While the numbers of the new 3.6 Pentastar V6 are good we still don't know how this fancy overhead cam engine is really going to perform off road until it shows up.


1st one- 1989 Cherokee Laredo. 12 great years
2nd one- 2001 Cherokee Limited. Got it before they were gone.
XJ2Timer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #92 of 101 Old 10-20-2010, 10:52 AM
Painbow6
Registered User
2001 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 107
Raise your hand if you want a diesel.

Past rigs:

2004 LJ- 35's and stuff
1978 Land Rover Series III- Winston, you will be sorely missed.
Painbow6 is offline  
post #93 of 101 Old 10-20-2010, 07:38 PM
Pallando
Registered User
1997 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Painbow6 View Post
Raise your hand if you want a diesel.
I cant imagine why anyone would ever want a gasser Jeep.

When I can afford to I'm swapping in a VW 1.9l TDI into my TJ.

With a tune it makes as much HP as a 4.0l gasser and about a third more torque.

This is the same engine that gets more then 40 MPG in a VW Jetta. Granted, Jeeps weigh more and have a higher coefficient of friction, but throw this engine in a Jeep and you should be able to attain, at the very least, 30mpg.
Pallando is offline  
post #94 of 101 Old 10-20-2010, 08:54 PM
tobias94yj
Hillbilly Member
 
tobias94yj's Avatar
1994 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sevierville, TN
Posts: 1,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfgangGullich View Post
God...when will people stop knocking the 3.8? It has 12 more hp that the 4.0 and 12 more lbft of torque...and it runs decent, it's reliable, and gets ok mileage. Granted it's motivating more weight around and thus not as fast but the engine seems to do the job just fine in both my JKs. K, I've gone off topics enough for the day
I have driven both and the 4.0L I6 is better suited for offroading, but I was not trying to compare it. My problem with jeep is they have some better v6's they could have offered in it 1) 4.0L v-6 that was used in the nitro and pacifica which was about 265HP and 2) the new 3.6 v6 that is coming in the 2011 GC. I would like to see an engine that i can comfortably pull my bass boat or a covered trailer with.

To view the NEW Jeep Encyclopedia click here!!!
tobias94yj is offline  
post #95 of 101 Old 10-20-2010, 09:06 PM
aerojeeptj
Registered User
2004 WJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: A Little South of Sanity
Posts: 878
Off the engine topic, I did hear about some Jeep "Easter Eggs" such as the black surrounding on the windshield (tint kinda stuff) for the 2011 will have a little Jeep climbing a rock in the lower corner and have the 7 slot grille logo in the area above the rear view mirror, if anyone can picture what I'm talking about lol. Another little feature is in the area in behind the rear seat where it has that compartment in the floor. There will have slots for all the hard top bolts to fit in. Each slot has a pic of the bolt above it so you know where to put them. I remember seeing this on a press video released on youtube
aerojeeptj is offline  
post #96 of 101 Old 10-21-2010, 12:37 AM
BadAsh74
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Painbow6 View Post
Raise your hand if you want a diesel.
Ill see this diesel and Ill raise you a HEMI.

No matter how good of a v-6 you can put together, its still a v-6 which is an engine meant for minivans and family sedans. A diesel would be awesome for efficiency as well as slow speed crawling. But for someone who might use the Wrangler as a tow rig, a hot rod, a mudder, or just for general badassery Ma Mopar needs to offer an avalable 8 cyl under the hood paired to either a manual tranny or slushbox. If AEV can charge $20K for the conversion ON TOP of the price of the Jeep, then a factory option should be doable for the price of a Hemi upgrade on any other vehicle.
BadAsh74 is offline  
post #97 of 101 Old 10-21-2010, 03:53 AM
TJJP77
Registered User
 
TJJP77's Avatar
2002 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somewhere, MI
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by XJ2Timer View Post
The 4.0 inline 6 couldn't meet emissions anymore.
Not even slightly true. 4.0L was already a ULEV engine and could easily be made to pass emissions standards well into the future. Your second reason (crash regulations) and low volume were the death of the 4.0L.

Chris
'02 Sahara
'06 Rubicon Unlimited
Sienna Jeep Club: Member #15
TJJP77 is offline  
post #98 of 101 Old 10-21-2010, 12:52 PM
XJ2Timer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Temple, TX
Posts: 805
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJJP77 View Post
Not even slightly true. 4.0L was already a ULEV engine and could easily be made to pass emissions standards well into the future. Your second reason (crash regulations) and low volume were the death of the 4.0L.
I based what I said on info from this page at Allpar. The writer Bob Sheaves is an engineer that used to work for Chrysler.
Jeep 4.0 liter six cylinder engine

Quote:
The reasons the 4.0L went away was due mainly to age of the manufacturing tooling, which was worn out. The long stroke made it harder to clean up the emissions of NOx, and NIH ("Not Invented Here"), in my opinion, also reared its head.

1st one- 1989 Cherokee Laredo. 12 great years
2nd one- 2001 Cherokee Limited. Got it before they were gone.
XJ2Timer is offline  
post #99 of 101 Old 10-21-2010, 01:19 PM
tobias94yj
Hillbilly Member
 
tobias94yj's Avatar
1994 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sevierville, TN
Posts: 1,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadAsh74 View Post
Ill see this diesel and Ill raise you a HEMI.

No matter how good of a v-6 you can put together, its still a v-6 which is an engine meant for minivans and family sedans. A diesel would be awesome for efficiency as well as slow speed crawling. But for someone who might use the Wrangler as a tow rig, a hot rod, a mudder, or just for general badassery Ma Mopar needs to offer an avalable 8 cyl under the hood paired to either a manual tranny or slushbox. If AEV can charge $20K for the conversion ON TOP of the price of the Jeep, then a factory option should be doable for the price of a Hemi upgrade on any other vehicle.
I have always heard that they can not put a v-8 in a wrangler and still be able to pass crash tests.

To view the NEW Jeep Encyclopedia click here!!!
tobias94yj is offline  
post #100 of 101 Old 10-21-2010, 07:55 PM
TJJP77
Registered User
 
TJJP77's Avatar
2002 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somewhere, MI
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by XJ2Timer View Post
I based what I said on info from this page at Allpar. The writer Bob Sheaves is an engineer that used to work for Chrysler.
Jeep 4.0 liter six cylinder engine
Yeah, I wish they would take that down or edit that because it's flat wrong. There's nothing about the inherent design of the 4.0L that would make it not pass emissions. The same improvements that are made to all engines (ignition upgrades, improvements to the injection system, software enhancements, improved sensors with wider operating range and greater accuracy, etc) could be made to the 4.0L as needed to continue to meet the standards. If you read Bob's bio, he last worked at Chrysler in 1992 and was mostly a suspension guy. Considering the 4.0L was made through 2006, I'd take what he says with a grain of salt.

Chris
'02 Sahara
'06 Rubicon Unlimited
Sienna Jeep Club: Member #15
TJJP77 is offline  
post #101 of 101 Old 10-23-2010, 12:57 PM
BadAsh74
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 191
The 4.0L would ABSOLUTELY be capable of meeting the new regulations. Look what GM did with the trailblazers old 4.2L I-6. They added a crossflow head with overhead cam and I think 24 valves. From what I understand, the basic block of that engine is the old I-6 that dates back decades. The same treatment for the 4.0 would work miracles and it would be a great base engine.

Why wouldnt a V-8 Wrangler meet crash standards? This sounds like some coporate B.S. to sidestep the fact that theyre just knuckling under to some CAFE, CARB, or environmental garbage. The Dakota is a similarly sized vehicle and has a V-8, same as the Grand Cherokee and all the LX cars. I guarantee that the Wrangler is at least as sturdy as any of those and would do just fine with a V-8.

If there WERE a problem with a Wrangler's ability to pass a crash test, then its probably based on the convoluted logic that the Jeep would be unsafe for other cars to get into a wreck with therefore the Jeep is the problem. These dinky little econoboxes are totalled if anything bigger than a sparrow hits one.
BadAsh74 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee = Dodge Journey??? roadman Future Models & Prototype Discussion 9 12-30-2012 10:02 AM
New Jeep based on Fiat Panda in 2011 chuckd94 Future Models & Prototype Discussion 152 09-01-2012 06:15 PM
2011 WL Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ Freak Future Models & Prototype Discussion 516 06-30-2011 01:07 AM
Wrangler gets 2.8L diesel in Oct slow2run Future Models & Prototype Discussion 93 03-05-2010 12:39 AM
09 wrangler engines bdoerr54 Future Models & Prototype Discussion 32 04-06-2009 07:51 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome