I test drove a TWO door JK with ONLY 10 miles on it!! I swear, my YJ with 224,000 miles on the 4.0, seemed to have more pick up then that 3.8!! I was really disappointed. BRING THE 4.0 BACK!!!!!!!
86 MJ LB Custom, 88 MJ SB Eliminator, 92 CJ9, 93 XJ Country, and 04 WJ Laredo/Limited
Originally Posted by XJ2Timer View Post
White 2WD 1995 ZJ 4.0
Jesus the Christ is my Lord and Savior. I know Him, do you?
Future Mods: get it working correctly
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by betorok View Post
that being said, my wife's xj completely destroys the jk in acceleration, and they get about the same mileage.
"The stoke was palpable..."
good grief, just buy the Rubicon.
i test drove a jk rubicon and i test drove an jk x(only standard they had) and ive driven my friends moms jk sahara and all three seemed sluggish to me, so i would be infavor of either bringing back the 4.0(highly doubt it) or my personnal favorite which theyve already made a few for the military as prototypes which is CRD J8, you cant go wrong with those, dana 44 front dana 60 rear(i think) and a diesel engine
Happiness is just a downshift away
2009 Ford Mustang GT-DD/Track Car
1999 Jeep Wrangler-Trail Rig
1989 Jeep Comanche-Project Truck
from my understanding, Im friends with the local jeep parts guy (as we pretty much all are).. Reno is the primary test zone for the Wranglers, and Chrysler brought up some 3.0 Diesel JK's to run the rubicon, and from what I understand they did exceptionally well and its more likely you'll see a Diesel JK before a Hemi.. But if you look on youtube, you can see some videos of 6.1L Wranglers..
In America, we like everyone to know about the good work we're doing anonymously.
I like how people are saying that they should bring back the 4.0, when they don't even realize that the 3.8 has more power and torque. If you put the 4.0 in a JK, it'd actually be even worse...
But you need to run the 3.8 at redline to get the extra horsepower. The 4.0 (and even the 4.2 with FI) produce a better horsepower/torque ratio at lower rpm's. Thats why it's better to swap in a diesel or V8 rather than a turbo charged 4 banger.
Marching or fighting, it all pays the same.
Wow I did not know there were so many experts on these forums! HAHA
92 XJ 6 1/2 RC lift plus 2in BB, 35x12.5 Mud Rovers m/ts Aussie front D30 and Powertrax locker C8.25 rear, Rusty HD steering, RC control arm drop brackets, Nates rear bumper, HD SYE, YJ brake lines, Transfer skid plate, Nates slim line front bumper, Smittybilt XRC-8 winch, converted A/C to onboard air, Rino lined Floor boards
06 TJ stock gone
08 JK Rubicon 3in Zone lift, 35x12.5x17KM2s 1.5 wheel spacers, Super Chips programmer
Originally Posted by Benny2Times View Post
|Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Jeep Forums||Replies||Last Post|
|Wrangler gets 2.8L diesel in Oct||slow2run||Future Models & Prototype Discussion||93||03-05-2010 12:39 AM|
|What will the new Cafe/EPA do to Wrangler||slow2run||Future Models & Prototype Discussion||37||06-15-2009 01:31 PM|
|SRT6 Wrangler||badoosh27||Future Models & Prototype Discussion||14||06-21-2007 05:54 PM|
|Wrangler based H4||Swee||Future Models & Prototype Discussion||1||02-21-2007 08:15 AM|
|Wrangler SRT6||RCHavok797||Future Models & Prototype Discussion||11||02-17-2007 06:27 AM|