Y-Link radius arm vs 4 Link and trackbar? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Cherokee & Comanche Forums > XJ Cherokee Technical Forum > Y-Link radius arm vs 4 Link and trackbar?

FS: Wranger BRIGHT License Plate LED! Just $3! Great valueECGS DOTW - $100 off Yukon 8.8 C-Clip Eliminator KitNitro Gear Packages Now Available at Rockridge 4wd

Reply
Unread 12-25-2006, 06:53 PM   #1
Muddy Cherokee
Registered User
1996 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 851
Y-Link radius arm vs 4 Link and trackbar?

I was poking around TNT Custom's site and noticed that the long arm suspension they designed for the ZJ is 4 link, while the XJ long arm suspension is a Y-Link radius arm. I find this sort of odd because the ZJ and XJ essentially share the same front suspension, so why the design difference? Also, which would you think is better? It seems like the 4 link is better because it would create less binding through the suspension cycle. Any thoughts?

__________________
[SIZE="1"]1996 Cherokee Sport
4.0L HO, AX-15, NP 231
RE 4.5" Lift, 32" Dunlop Mud Rovers, RE Hack'n'Tap, CV Driveshaft, D30/D44, 4.10's, Aussie Lockers, ZJ Tierod, F/R recovery points[/SIZE]
Muddy Cherokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-25-2006, 08:23 PM   #2
Bryson
Registered User
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,464
I had the same question come to mind a couple months ago, and found that pretty much a 4 link front or 3 link with a track bar is really the ideal setup because if it's made right, it won't bind the DS or suspension components.

However, we also came up with the conclusion, that for all practical purposes the Y link is just fine for most jeeps. This is because the suspension doesn't compress a huge amount during normal operation causing any bind. When articulated though, the two setups are nearly identical. The only down side to the Y link for the jeeps I think is the overall stress put on the axle side bushings during articulation. when the axle twists, the upper Y link is going to want to extend and compress depending on which side of the axle, where as a 4 or 3 link would simply give a slight bump steer.
__________________

99 chilipepper red XJ: Race car tow rig. Turbo project in the works.

Head of Core production - www.CortekSystems.com
Owner of Boostwerks.com
Website in development.
Bryson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-26-2006, 01:42 PM   #3
Muddy Cherokee
Registered User
1996 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 851
Would it be possible to retrofit the ZJ LA 4 Link onto an XJ?
__________________
[SIZE="1"]1996 Cherokee Sport
4.0L HO, AX-15, NP 231
RE 4.5" Lift, 32" Dunlop Mud Rovers, RE Hack'n'Tap, CV Driveshaft, D30/D44, 4.10's, Aussie Lockers, ZJ Tierod, F/R recovery points[/SIZE]
Muddy Cherokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.