Rear axle in 91 XJ Laredo? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Cherokee & Comanche Forums > XJ Cherokee Technical Forum > Rear axle in 91 XJ Laredo?

Ring & Pinion's, Lockers, 4340 Axles, Install Kits, BaBilstein Shock Upgrade Kits, Jeep JK TJ XJ Wranglers and CJeep Wrangler Complete Gear Upgrade Kits with Installs and

Reply
Unread 08-15-2004, 01:19 PM   #1
exc911ence
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 453
Rear axle in 91 XJ Laredo?

I used to have a 91 XJ Laredo with the 4.0L HO engine and 5-speed tranny. I thought the rear axle was a Dana 35... am I wrong? Why I ask is that the guys on the TJ forum are always trashing the Dana 35 as being a weakling but if that's the axle I ran in the XJ, it took TONS of on and off-road abuse (including a trip to the dragstrip where I showed it no mercy) and never blew-up. So what's the deal? A Dana 35 in a 4-cylinder TJ will die the second it's off-roaded yet it withstands 190hp and power-shifting in a Cherokee?

exc911ence is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-15-2004, 05:41 PM   #2
98XJ-ID
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kimberly, Idaho
Posts: 226
with the tow package some older XJ's had the Dana 44. Newer XJ's have the D35 or the Corp 8.25, but I dont kno if they used the 8.25 in older Xj's
__________________
1990 Jeep Comanche Pioneer 4x4
4.0L - D30/D35 - 5-Speed - NP231- 130K
1998 Jeep Cherokee Classic 4x4
4.0L - D30/Corp 8.25 LSD - NV242 From a 2002 Grand Cherokee - 4" Suspension/31's - 136K
98XJ-ID is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-15-2004, 07:20 PM   #3
AMK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grayson, GA
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by exc911ence
I used to have a 91 XJ Laredo with the 4.0L HO engine and 5-speed tranny. I thought the rear axle was a Dana 35... am I wrong? Why I ask is that the guys on the TJ forum are always trashing the Dana 35 as being a weakling but if that's the axle I ran in the XJ, it took TONS of on and off-road abuse (including a trip to the dragstrip where I showed it no mercy) and never blew-up. So what's the deal? A Dana 35 in a 4-cylinder TJ will die the second it's off-roaded yet it withstands 190hp and power-shifting in a Cherokee?
The D35 is a relatively weak axle, but you have to look at what you are comparing it to. There are a lot of TJs running 33s. The D35 isn't quite strong enough to handle a 33in tire when wheeling it hard, but it is plenty strong enough to handle stock sized tires.

The c-clips in the D35 are weak points as are the axle tubes in general. They are known to bend and crack -- which is why axle trusses are sometimes used.

__________________
YJ->donated; XJ->donated; XJ->in progress.
AMK is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-15-2004, 10:12 PM   #4
exc911ence
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 453
True, the average TJ would be running larger tires... I had 31x10.5-15s on my XJ and they looked huge but 31s look a tad small on the Wrangler...

exc911ence is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-16-2004, 01:24 AM   #5
isezumi00
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,234
I think people over exaggerate the weakness of the D35 axle.

No, the D35 isnt going to hold up well against 33" super swampers and an ARB locker. Then again, that combo can snap a D44 too.
__________________
'91 XJ Laredo
Rustys 3" Coils Frankenleef rears||DT3000 shocks||JKS Quicker DQ
Optima Red Top||Mixin' match 31x10.5x15|| Rusty's HD Trac Bar
isezumi00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.