|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
|
NP 231 Vs 242 transfer case
Which one is better? Are they able to be switched with eachother?
__________________
"Your not Jeepin until you get stuck" "Im not jeepin unless i break something" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Man In Black
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago-area (Western Suburbs)
Posts: 2,068
|
Depends on what you value. The 231 has tons of aftermarket options, the 242 has very little. The 231, from the factory, is stronger. The 242 has the ability to drive in 4WD FullTime, the 231 can't.
So if FullTime 4WD is important, then you have one choice. If not then you have a very common and available choice. And yes they can be exchanged, but it is mildly involved and expensive as drivshaft lengths have to be changed.
__________________
-Marc- Sweet Pea 1998 - XJ http://www.grobe.us/Jeep - JeepForum Rules - Become a Premium Member or Vendor For Sale: (4) AR 767-5766 Wheels (used) 15x7, 5x4.5, 4.5BS - for local pickup in the Chicago-area |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
from a 96-98 ZJ or 96-01 XJ, it is a simple swap. Both driveshafts will fit. A person with some mechanical ability and a couple of floor jacks can do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Man In Black
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago-area (Western Suburbs)
Posts: 2,068
|
But if you go from a 231 to a 242, chances are the driveshaft will be too short.
__________________
-Marc- Sweet Pea 1998 - XJ http://www.grobe.us/Jeep - JeepForum Rules - Become a Premium Member or Vendor For Sale: (4) AR 767-5766 Wheels (used) 15x7, 5x4.5, 4.5BS - for local pickup in the Chicago-area |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
|
I have a 242, it is pretty decent sometimes I have to cut off the jeep to get it out of 4wd, but other than that it is great, the hack 'n' tap is sturdy and cheaper than the HD for the 231.
__________________
1998 Cherokee Classic... 2" BB on Moabs 1988 Cherokee Limited... 4.5" RC lift, RK longarms, on 31's. Several homemade skids. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Courtenay, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 1,357
|
this is gonna get ugly
__________________
1990 Jeep Cherokee Laredo 4.0L Automatic Tranny NP242 Transfer case Dana 30 front, 35 custom rear differentials Mods: RE 4.5" Lift 32x11.50 BFGoodRich M/T KM's American Eagle 058 Polished Aluminum Wheels, 3.63" BS. Grand Cherokee Rear Disc Brake setup Custom Downpipe W/ Cat Removed. Dynomax Super Turbo Muffler. Surco Roof Rack My Jeep |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
|
i just got a jeeep eqipped with the 242 and I have to backup to get the center diff to unlock. thats really the only pain that it causes.
__________________
1995 sport 4.0/ax15/np231, 3in lift, moab wheels, 245-75-16 goodyear mtrs 1987 4.0/aw4/np242 dana 44 (RIP) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Ive got 2 NP242 chasts and 3 NP231 shafts and every one of them is exactly the same. length, ujoints....everything about them is the same, right now i'm running a 242 shaft with my 231 works perfect.
__________________
[SIZE=1][FONT=Tahoma]89 XJ 4door - Limited - AW4 - NP231 - 180K - 31's - About 5" Lift - Trimmed [COLOR=Red]Red Jeep Club Member [B]#275[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Man In Black
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago-area (Western Suburbs)
Posts: 2,068
|
I personally haven't seen the two cases side by side, but I could have sworn that the 242 had a longer tail cone, kind of like the 249 in this picture.
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=48262 But apparently the difference is negligible. I was wrong, thanks for correcting that.
__________________
-Marc- Sweet Pea 1998 - XJ http://www.grobe.us/Jeep - JeepForum Rules - Become a Premium Member or Vendor For Sale: (4) AR 767-5766 Wheels (used) 15x7, 5x4.5, 4.5BS - for local pickup in the Chicago-area |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NJ Exits 168, 105, 77 take your pick
Posts: 697
|
its all preference, the strength difference is irrelevant IMO because 9 times out of 10 both cases are adequate and in situations where they arent adequate guys are running beefier aftermarket or swapped cases anyway.
What you'll find on this board is 242 guys telling you the 242 is better and 231 guys saying the same for the 231.
__________________
2000 XJ 4.0 aw4 np 242
Bastard 2.5" Lift 30" Kumho MT's Belly Armor RE H&T w/ front shaft |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Web Wheeler
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Centralia, Washington
Posts: 1,001
|
I have had the luxury of both. In my 2000 XJ I had the 231, which was fine. In my 91 XJ I have the 242 which is awesome becuase of the Fulltime 4wd. Even if its raining and you plan on going through some corners and stuff I just pop it into 4wd. If you where to do this with a 231 you would burn it up. They both act the same as far as putting it in 4wd and taking it out. Both my Xj's were stock so I can't comment on the strength of the Cases.
__________________
2002 WJ Laredo 4.7 97 XJ 4.0 AW4 150k Harness Upgrade, PIAA intense white bulbs. Soon to have 6.5LA and 33x12.50 97 ZJ 5.2 Limited 144k 31x10.50 MT's Flowmaster Super 44 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzi9wYMGpVU) Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
|
242 4 the W!
Atlas 2 going in within 2 years though.
__________________
[B]CANCER AND LUEKEMIA SUCK[/B] Proud to be a Christian |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I had a 231 and a 242 side by side and there was no external difference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
From 96 on, they all look like the 231 in the picture, a new and better way to attach the drive shaft to the case. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
| Suggested Threads |
|