[sharpie]

Originally Posted by EricsXJ

Actually no. An MJ won the Stocker Class back in August '04 http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f11/august-cherokees-month-96862/ although his was the only rig entered. (Not at all taking anything away from his win...)

And those people (88XJSport) and others who don't like the rules, need to either get over it and participate, or shut up and not participate.

You know I love you, Eric

[HeavyMetal]

Originally Posted by EricsXJ

And those people (88XJSport) and others who don't like the rules, need to either get over it and participate, or shut up and not participate.

x 44884954857954860695859854680458645096580694567045 65709586745067450964560958604567

congrats on the win gentlemen

[88XJSport]

So everybody on Jeepforum.com has to agree with what everybody else says??? I thought we could voice our opinions...

[HeavyMetal]

Originally Posted by 88XJSport

So everybody on Jeepforum.com has to agree with what everybody else says??? I thought we could voice our opinions...

i think theres a difference between voicing your opinion, and making your opinion overbearing constantly even in the face of majority ruling over and over again

[sharpie]

Originally Posted by HeavyMetal

i think theres a difference between voicing your opinion, and making your opinion overbearing constantly even in the face of majority ruling over and over again

[randyscj]

Thanks for the votes and compliments!!!

[EricsXJ]

Originally Posted by 88XJSport

So everybody on Jeepforum.com has to agree with what everybody else says??? I thought we could voice our opinions...

Since you seem to have selective memory loss, I'll explain (for everyones sake).

A few months back you submitted an entry for the Stocker Class and when I didn't choose your Jeep, you were offended and accused me in a PM of being biased to guys with big lifts and big tires (in the Stocker Class.... raiight). I responded to your PM and explained why and that you weren't the only one denied. Apparently you couldn't accept that, and every time a discussion of the COM and even during posts about the Calendar, you always claim that it is unfair and that you are discriminated against, and even hated because you drive a stocker. This has continued for months, but I have not responded to your negativity and let you voice your "opinion".

Even in this COM you are blinded by your own ignorance and didn't notice that there were other entries in the Stocker Class with no lift and a few with 235's. What you don't know is that at least one guy that entered this month was also denied in past COMs but made it in this time. What you also don't know is that others were denied this month and some of them DID have lifts and bigger tires than 235's. You were denied once, and haven't put in for it again, but continue to hold a grudge and claim that stockers are being discriminated against.

So now that you won't give up with voicing your displeasure in the open forum, we have come to this. Its time to put a stop to it. Let that be your warning.

[cj7guy]

I think if you changed the name of the class from:

"Stocker"
to
"Biggest F'in tires possible on a BB"

there would be no objections.

I entered once when my Jeep was totally stock, and was not chosen, but that doesn't bother me so much because it was truly stock (225s), no BB, and no real mods that would help in the woods. Although I was disappointed, I figured that was appropriate.

I am not alone on the tire size thing.

Originally Posted by isenegger

aww come on 33"s.....thats not a stocker.....haha

Originally Posted by 88XJSport

DQ him.

Originally Posted by Jeepernick

DITTO... but the rules are stated
"Stocker Class - "Stocker" only because this class is limited to stock suspension height, UpCountry, or 2" budget boost lifts. Any other modification of the vehicle is allowed."

Honestly, it is completely within the rules, it just seems a little weird to see stocker and 33s together.

That being said, life's not fair, so we all need to get bigger tires if we want to win, or just get over it.

[SkyHigHXJ]

I didnt get accepted either, but thats all up to eric, theres always a next month

[RussoGuitar]

Congrats to both, nice jeeps..

[olds442]

wow yall girls need to stop your crying........congrats to the winners

[EricsXJ]

Originally Posted by SkyHigHXJ

I didnt get accepted either, but thats all up to eric, theres always a next month

I didn't remember seeing your entry so I just went and checked to make sure. As I suspected, I never received your entry...

[SkyHigHXJ]

Shucks, guess i did it wrong. Oh well, Randy had me beat either way lol. Sweet Rig Randy

[rob92xj]

Congrats guys.
Eric I have had a set of 33x 12.5's on my XJ from what I have found there is no way anyone can have 33's on a BB without hacking up the rear 1/4 panels, properly bumpstoped there is no need as there is only 1/2" of clearence from the tires to the wheel well.

[EricsXJ]

Originally Posted by rob92xj

Congrats guys.
Eric I have had a set of 33x 12.5's on my XJ from what I have found there is no way anyone can have 33's on a BB without hacking up the rear 1/4 panels, properly bumpstoped there is no need as there is only 1/2" of clearence from the tires to the wheel well.

So are you saying Reelrebel's setup is something other than what he submitted? You can see in the pics that the front is trimmed and maybe he did the back too. I agree that 33" tires is A LOT of tire for a 2" lift, but it isn't impossible. Maybe you saw the thread I posted of my friend's rig that had 33's with no lift. It can be done, and while highly modified, my friend's rig would also have qualified for the Stocker Class based purely on suspension height. Also perhaps those brand of tires that Reelrebel is running measure very small or are worn???